Patna High Court
GOPAL KUMARversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The High Court set aside the order denying anticipatory bail and directed that bail be granted to the appellants.
Summary
The appellants, Gopal Kumar and Amarjeet Ray, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting and robbing the husband of informant Rinki Paswan. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Exclusive Special Court. The appellants contended that the case was false, motivated by a personal dispute, and that the SC/ST Act was inapplicable as the victim belonged to a general caste. The High Court examined the merits of the anticipatory bail application and the relevance of the SC/ST provisions. Finding the prosecution case doubtful and the allegations unsubstantiated, the Court set aside the order denying bail and directed that bail be granted upon furnishing a bond. Consequently, the appeal was allowed and the appellants were ordered to be released on bail within eight weeks of the order.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the appellants under the circumstances of the case
- Whether the provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act are applicable when the alleged victim belongs to a general caste
- Whether the order of the Exclusive Special Court denying bail was legally sound
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 323, 34, 341, 354, 379, 504, 506
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act — s. 3(i), 3(r), 3(s)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Indian Penal Code
- SC/ST Act
- bail order
- false allegations
- caste discrimination
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4998 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2023 Thana- TISIAUTA District- Vaishali
======================================================
1. GOPAL KUMAR Son of Ranjeet Kumar R/o vill - Shahpur, P.S. - Tisiauta,
Dist. - Vaishali
2. Amarjeet Ray @ Amarjeet Kumar Son of Naresh Ray R/o vill - Shahpur,
P.S. - Tisiauta, Dist. - Vaishali
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Rinki Paswan Wife of Raushan Kumar Chaudhary R/o vill - Shahpur, P.s. -
Tisiauta, Dist.- Vaishali
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellants : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl.PP
For Respondent No. 2 : None
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
5 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants
and learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the
respondent-State.
2. Despite valid service of notice, no body appears on
behalf of the informant/Respondent No. 2.
3. This appeal has been filed for setting aside order
dated 23.09.2023 passed in a case registered for the offence
punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 504, 506 and 34
of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4998 of 2023(5) dt.19-03-2026
2/4
whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of these appellants has
been rejected.
4. As per prosecution case, on 06.06.2023 at about
11 AM, when husband of informant was coming back from
brick kiln on his motorcycle with ten thousand rupees cash and
reached near the house of one Subandh Chaudhary, in the
meantime, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these
appellants, armed with deadly weapons, started abusing husband
of informant and on the orders of co-accused Sitaram Rai,
Appellant No. 1 and co-accused Aman Kumar snatched
motorcycle and cash from husband of informant, co-accused
Sitaram Rai tore the clothes of the informant and Appellant No.
2 snatched gold Mangalsutra of the informant. It is further
alleged that the accused persons assaulted informant and her
husband and demanded Rangdari of Rs. 10,000/-
5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
behalf of the appellants that appellants are quite innocent and
have committed no offence. The present case has been lodged
by the informant/Respondent No. 2 only at the instigation of her
husband in order to save one Avinash Chaudhary, who happens
to be his relative, from Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 52 of 2023. As a
matter of fact, Avinash Chaudhary used to misbehave with one
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4998 of 2023(5) dt.19-03-2026
3/4
Deepmala, daughter of Ravindra Ray, for which a Panchayati
was convened in which all the named accused persons,
including these appellants, were witnesses and thereafter,
Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 52 of 2023 was lodged against Avinash
Chaudhary and only with a view to save his skin from the
aforesaid case, this false and concocted case has been lodged.
Moreover, the present case has been lodged after inordinate
delay of four days and there is no plausible explanation for the
same which itself makes the entire prosecution case doubtful. It
is further submitted that as per prosecution case, all the F.I.R.
named accused persons, including these appellants, abused
husband of informant/Respondent No. 2, however, husband of
informant/Respondent No. 2 belongs to general caste and as
such, no case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act is made out against these
appellants. Appellants claim clean antecedents.
6. Learned Spl. P.P. appearing for the respondent-State
has opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellants.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated
23.09.2023 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Court,
SC/ST Act, Vaishali, Hajipur in connection with Tisiauta P.S.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4998 of 2023(5) dt.19-03-2026
4/4
Case No. 53 of 2023 is hereby set aside with respect to these
appellants only.
8. Accordingly, let the appellants, named above, in the
event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from the
date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Exclusive Special Court, SC/ST Act, Hajipur, Vaishali in
connection with Tisiauta P.S. Case No. 53 of 2023.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
shashank/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.