Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Babu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The High Court held that the appellant is entitled to bail as there is no specific allegation against him and he has a clean antecedent.

Summary

The appellant, Ram Babu Paswan, was charged under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the Bihar Navik Samanvay Act, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting the father of an informant in a rent dispute. The appellant argued that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR contains only a general, omnibus allegation against all accused, with no specific charge against him. The trial court refused regular bail, prompting an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Patna High Court examined the lack of specific allegation, the appellant’s clean record, and the nature of the offence, and concluded that bail should be granted. The court set aside the lower court’s order, granted bail on a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, and imposed conditions regarding cooperation, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents. The appeal was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant is entitled to regular bail despite being named in the FIR under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
  • Whether a general and omnibus allegation against all accused suffices to deny bail.
  • Whether the appellant’s clean antecedent and lack of specific charge warrant the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • SC/ST Act
  • omnibus allegation
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 14(A)(2) CrPC
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5105 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2025 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Ram Babu Paswan S/O Chandrika Paswan R/O Vill.- Runni, Ward No.-
                 04,P.S- Runni Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi, Pin Code-843328 (Bihar)

                                                                                  ... ... Appellant/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Ramesh Paswan S/O Dahaur Paswan R/O Vill.- Runni, Ward No.- 04,P.S-
                 Runni Saidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi, Pin Code-843328 (Bihar)

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s     :        Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Ms. Usha Kumari 1, SPP
                 For the Resp. No. 2     :        Mr. Adarsh Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   18-04-2026                     Heard Mr. Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   appellant, Mr. Adarsh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the Respondent No. 2 as well as Ms. Usha Kumari 1,

                   learned Spl.P.P. for the State.

                               2. This is an appeal under Sections 14(A)(2) against

                   refusal of the prayer for regular bail by order dated 15.10.2025

                   passed by the learned Court of 1st Additional Sessions Judge-

                   cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (PoA) Act, Sitamarhi (District &

                   Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Sitamarhi) in

                   connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No. 186 of 2025,

                   F.I.R. dated 14.05.2025 registered under Sections 103(1) & 3(5)

                   of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5105 of 2025(4) dt.18-04-2026
                                             2/4




          and Scheduled Tribes Act (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

                       3. According to the prosecution case, all the accused

          persons including this appellant over a rent dispute have

          assaulted to the father of the informant due to which received

          injuries.

                       4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

          appellant has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

          implicated in the present case. He further submits that due to

          petty dispute the present occurrence has taken place. Although

          the appellant is named in the FIR but there is no specific

          allegation of assault or overt act attributed against him rather

          there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused

          persons including this appellant. He further submits that the

          police, after investigation, submitted charge sheet against the

          appellant. The appellant is in custody since 27.06.2025.

                       5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          Respondent No. 2 as well as learned Special Public Prosecutor

          for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the

          appellant.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case that the appellant has clean antecedent and there is

          no specific allegation against the appellant rather there is
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5105 of 2025(4) dt.18-04-2026
                                             3/4




          general and omnibus allegation against him, let the appellant,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Court of 1st Additional

          Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST (PoA) Act, Sitamarhi

          (District & Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge,

          Sitamarhi) in connection with Runni Saidpur P.S. Case No. 186

          of 2025, with other following conditions:-

                       i. Appellant shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the appellant tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the appellant and in case at

          any stage it is found that the appellant have concealed his

          criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

          cancellation of bail bond of the appellant. However, the

          acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
            Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5105 of 2025(4) dt.18-04-2026
                                                         4/4




                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.

                                   7. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and

                      this appeal stands allowed.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.