Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

ADITYA RAJ @ DHUNNUversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the criminal appeal and disposed of it as withdrawn.

Summary

The appellants, four accused persons, filed Criminal Appeal No.638 of 2025 arising from a 2024 case in Sasaram, Rohtas. They sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel, Mr. Kumar Vikram, made the application before Justice Praveen Kumar. The Court examined the request and, finding no objection, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may permit the withdrawal of a criminal appeal filed by the appellants.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • criminal procedure
  • procedural law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.638 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2024 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
           1.     ADITYA RAJ @ DHUNNU S/O SHYAM BIHARI SINGH R/o vill -
                  Madaini, P.O.- Avandhiya, P.S.- Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas
           2.    Arvind Kumar Singh @ Arvind Kumar S/o Ram Bachhan Singh R/o vill -
                 Madaini, P.O.- Avandhiya, P.S.- Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas
           3.    Kaushal Raj @ Kaushal Kumar S/o Raj Kumar R/o vill - Madaini, P.O.-
                 Avandhiya, P.S.- Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas
           4.    Ravi Kumar S/o Ram Bachhan Singh R/o vill - Madaini, P.O.- Avandhiya,
                 P.S.- Sasaram, Distt.- Rohtas
                                                                       ... ... Appellants
                                               Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.     Luv Kumar S/o Krishna Paswan R/o vill- Dayalpur, P.O.- Sasaram, P.S.-
                  Sasaram (Mufasil), Dist.- Rohtas
                                                                     ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellants      :       Mr. Kumar Vikram, Advocate
                 For the Respondent-State:       Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   18-02-2026                      Mr. Kumar Vikram, learned counsel for the

                   appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal on

                   behalf of all the appellants.

                               2. Permission is accorded.

                               3. This appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.



                                             (Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.