Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nand Kishore RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The High Court allowed the appellant’s anticipatory bail, setting aside the trial court’s order rejecting it.

Summary

An FIR dated 10 January 2018 alleged that the appellant, Nand Kishore Rai, along with others, entered a house and assaulted the female occupant with knives and other weapons, causing injuries, theft of jewellery and mobile phone, and caste-based abuse. The appellant contended that he was falsely implicated due to a land dispute and that no specific overt act was alleged against him, noting that the police charge‑sheet did not send him to trial. The Special Judge had taken cognizance of three other accused under various IPC and SC/ST Act provisions, but the appellant’s anticipatory bail application was rejected by the trial court. On appeal, the Patna High Court examined the nature of the accusations, the material on record, and the appellant’s claim of innocence, and concluded that bail could be granted subject to conditions. Consequently, the appellate court set aside the trial court’s order and allowed the appellant’s anticipatory bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate exercise of discretion by the trial court in granting or refusing anticipatory bail to the appellant under the IPC and SC/ST Act?
  • Whether the material on record justifies the denial of anticipatory bail in view of the appellant’s claim of false implication and lack of specific overt act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • SC/ST Act
  • assault
  • caste based violence
  • IPC
  • false implication
  • land dispute

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.844 of 2025
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2018 Thana- SC/ST District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Nand Kishore Rai S/O Late Dineshwar Rai @ Dileshwar Rai R/O Mohalla-
                 Badal Tola, Haldi Chapra, P.S- Maner, Distt.- Patna.


                                                                                     ... ... Appellant/s
                                                         Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Anita Kumari D/O Sri Raj Kumar Ram R/O Mohalla- Maner Bazar, P.S-
                 Maner, Distt.- Patna.


                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Appellant/s      :        Mr. D.K. Sinha, Sr. Advocate
                                                   Mr. Alexander Ashok, Mr. Jawed Akhtar,
                                                   Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocates
                 For the Respondent/s     :        Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. Public Prosecutor
                 For the R.No. 2          :        Mr. Pradhan Murli, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   12-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the appellant, respondent

                   no. 2 and the State.

                                2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated

                   22.01.2025 passed by learned Exclusive Special Judge SC/ST

                   Act, Civil Court, (Sadar) Patna in ABP No. 79 of 2025 arising

                   out of SC/ST P.S. Case No. 03 of 2018, registered under

                   Sections 147, 148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354(B),

                   504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(g),

                   3(1)(p), 3(1)(w), 3(1)(z) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled

                   Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.844 of 2025(4) dt.12-03-2026
                                             2/4




          anticipatory bail of appellant has been rejected.

                       3. As per F.I.R., on 10.01.2018 at about 11 AM, when

          informant was cooking food in her house, all the F.I.R. named

          accused persons, including this appellant, entered the house and

          assaulted her by means of knife, rod, sword as a result of which

          she sustained injuries. It is further alleged that when brother of

          the informant came to save her, he was also assaulted. The

          accused persons also snatched gold earrings, gold chain and a

          mobile phone and abused informant by caste name.

                       4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that

          appellant is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter

          of fact, appellant has falsely been implicated in this cases due to

          land dispute between the parties. Allegation of assault is general

          and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act

          against the appellant. Police after investigation submitted

          chargesheet against other accused persons whereas this

          appellant and co-accused Vishawajit Kumar have not been sent

          up for trial as they were not found guilty of the offences.

          Accordingly, learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna has taken

          cognizance against three persons namely, Avinash Kumar,

          Abhitabh Kumar and Kamal Kishore Rai under Sections 147,

          148, 149, 448, 341, 323, 307, 324, 379, 504, 506 and 354B of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.844 of 2025(4) dt.12-03-2026
                                             3/4




          the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1) (r) (s) (g) (p) (w) (z) of

          the SC/ST Act and accepted final form, not sent up for trial

          against the appellant. However, during trial respondent no. 2

          filed a petition under Section 319 Cr.P.C on 21.12.2023. It is not

          the case of informant that the alleged incident occurred within

          public view and as such, no case under SC/ST Act is made out

          against the appellant. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only

          to make the case grave.

                       5. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2

          vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that

          injury caused by this appellant is grievous in nature.

                       6. Considering the nature of accusation and materials

          available on record, let the appellant, as named above, in the

          event of his arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from

          today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge

          SC/ST Act, Civil Court, (Sadar) Patna in ABP No. 79 of 2025

          arising out of SC/ST P.S. Case No. 03 of 2018.

                       7. Accordingly, this criminal appeal is allowed and

          impugned order dated 22.01.2025 is set aside with respect to
              Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.844 of 2025(4) dt.12-03-2026
                                                           4/4




                        this appellant only.



                                               (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.