Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanchan DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the criminal appeal, dismissing it as withdrawn.

Summary

The appellants filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.888 of 2025 arising from a 2023 case in Panapur, Saran. During the hearing on 17-03-2026, the appellants' counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the appeal, citing the liberty to approach the Court at the time of framing of charge. The Court considered the procedural propriety of allowing withdrawal at that stage. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court granted the permission sought by the appellants. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the Court again if needed at the charge‑framing stage.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may permit withdrawal of a criminal appeal at the stage of framing of charge

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • withdrawal of appeal
  • procedural law
  • charge framing

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.888 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2023 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran
                  ======================================================
            1.     Kanchan Devi Wife of Late Devendra Singh Village- Pipra, P.O- Satjora,
                   P.S- Panapur, District- Saran at Chapra
            2.    Pritam Kumar Singh @ Pritam Singh son of Rakesh Singh Village- Pipra,
                  P.O- Satjora, P.S- Panapur, District- Saran at Chapra
            3.    Chandra Shekhar Singh Son of Haribansh Narayan Singh @ Haribansh
                  Singh village-Sishai, Po- Dumarsan Bangra, Ps- mashrakh, Dist- Saran at
                  Chapra
            4.    Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Singh son of Chandra Shekhar singh village-Sishai,
                  Po- Dumarsan Bangra, Ps- mashrakh, Dist- Saran at Chapra
            5.    Gavaskar Singh son of Haribansh Narayan Singh @ Haribansh Singh
                  village-Sishai, Po- Dumarsan Bangra, Ps- mashrakh, Dist- Saran at Chapra
            6.    Dhrup Kumar Singh @ Dhrup Singh son of Mahant Singh village- Pakri
                  Narottam, Po- Satjora, Ps- panapur, Dist- Saran at Chapra
            7.    Sunny Kumar Giri @ Sunni Giri son of LalBabu Giri village- and Post-
                  Dubauli, at Present village and post office- Satjora, Ps- Panapur, Dist- Saran
                  at chapra
            8.    Viccky Singh @ Ranjan Kumar Singh Son of Manoj Singh village and po-
                  Sareyan Basant, Ps- Taraiya, Dist- Saran at Chapra

                                                                                    ... ... Appellant/s
                                                        Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.    Geeta Devi Wife of Santosh Nut village- Bagdiha, Po- Satjora, Ps- panapur,
                  Dist- Saran

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Appellant/s     :        Mr.Jeetendra Narayan
                  For the Respondent/s    :        Mr.Binay Krishna
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

16   17-03-2026         1. Heard learned Counsel for the appellants and learned

                             Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                        2.   After some arguments, learned Counsel for the appellants

                             seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to
            Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.888 of 2025(16) dt.17-03-2026
                                                         2/2




                               approach this Court at the time of framing of charge.

                          3. Permission is granted.

                          4.   This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty

                               aforesaid.



                                                                         (Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-

U √     T   √


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.