Patna High Court
Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Ray @ Pintu Yadav @ Randhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The bail application was dismissed, denying the petitioner any relief.
Summary
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, was arrested in connection with a robbery in which Rs. 3,62,200 was allegedly stolen from Vishwam Kumar, and was charged under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S. and Sections 25(1‑B)(a) and 26(1) of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he had been falsely implicated, despite having eight prior criminal cases, and had been in custody since 21‑07‑2025, offering to cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed bail, relying on the petitioner’s confessional statement that admitted guilt. The Court examined the seriousness of the offences, the existence of a confession, and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents. Concluding that the gravity of the offences outweighed the petitioner’s assurances, the Court refused to grant bail and dismissed the application.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the offences and his confession.
- Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication and his prior criminal antecedents affect the bail decision.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- confession
- criminal antecedents
- Arms Act
- theft
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10026 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-329 Year-2025 Thana- BEUR District- Patna
======================================================
Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Ray @ Pintu Yadav @ Randhir Kumar S/o- Rajendra
Prasad Yadav R/v- Lalji tola PS- Gandhi Maidan Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Arya, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 30-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Beur
P.S. Case No. 329/2025 registered for the offences punishable
under Section 309(6) of B.N.S. and Section 25(1-B)(a), 26(1)
35 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals
committed loot of Rs. 3,62,200/- from one Vishwam Kumar.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned
counsel further submits that he has eight criminal antecedents
and he is in custody since 21.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes
to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10026 of 2026(3) dt.30-03-2026
2/2
for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner
has accepted his guilt in his confessional statement.
6. Considering the gravity of the offence, this Court is
not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.