Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Haruk Ram @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court refused to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Haruk Ram, applied for regular bail in a case registered as Khaira P.S. Case No. 491 of 2025, wherein he is accused of arsonously burning the informant's shop after a dispute over the sale of goods, causing a loss of Rs. 10 lakh. The charges include offences under Sections 324(5), 326(g), 351(2), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act. The petitioner has been in custody since 2 January 2026. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations, the nature of the offences, and the fact that the petitioner remains in custody. Concluding that the nature of the allegations warranted denial of bail, the court dismissed the bail application, while clarifying that the order is limited to the bail question and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of offences under Sections 324(5), 326(g), 351(2), 352 of the IPC and Section 3(5) of the BNS, considering the seriousness of the allegations.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • arson
  • IPC offences
  • property damage
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10113 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-491 Year-2025 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
                 Haruk Ram @ Raju Kumar Son of Late Sakaldeo Ram @ Late Sakindra Ram
                 R/o Village - Kolhua, P.S. - Khaira(now Gidhaur), Dist. - Jamui.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Anil Prasad Singh
                                                  Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay
                 For the Informant        :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra
                                                  Mr. Ashok Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   07-04-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                     2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection

                   with Khaira P.S. Case No. 491 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   uunder Sections 324(5), 326(g), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the

                   BNS.

                                     3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   accused of burning the shop of the informant when the

                   informant denied to sell the goods to the petitioner in the night

                   which caused a loss of Rs. 10 lakhs to the informant.

                                     4. The petitioner is in custody since 2.1.2026.

                                     5. Considering the nature of allegation levelled
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10113 of 2026(4) dt.07-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to

                    the petitioner.

                                 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

                                 7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                    herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                    expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.



                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.