Patna High Court
Jairam Singh @ Jayram SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SOURENDRA PANDEY
Holding
The application is disposed as the petitioners intend to withdraw it and file a fresh application before the trial court.
Summary
The petitioners, Jairam Singh, Raj Kumar, and Sohan Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Muro Devi. The petitioners, through counsel, indicated that they would not press the present application and intended to file a fresh application before the trial court. The learned judge considered the petitioners' request to withdraw the current application. He granted them liberty to withdraw without prejudice. Consequently, the application was disposed, leaving the trial court to consider the forthcoming application on its merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the present application should be dismissed on account of the petitioners' intention to withdraw and file a fresh application before the trial court
Subjects
- application withdrawal
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous
- high court
- petition
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10183 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2009 Thana- SC/ST District- Munger
======================================================
1. Jairam Singh @ Jayram Singh S/o- Late Sattan Singh Village- Goghi, P.S.
Piri Bazar, District- Lakhisarai
2. Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Singh S/o- Jairam Singh @ Jayram Singh Village-
Goghi, P.S. Piri Bazar, District- Lakhisarai
3. Sohan Singh S/o- Late Manilal Singh @ Late Mani Singh Village- Goghi,
P.S. Piri Bazar, District- Lakhisarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Bihar
2. Muro Devi W/o- Late Sudhir Manjhi Village- Goghi, P.S. Piri Bazar,
District- Lakhisarai
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Soni Shrivastava, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sadanand Paswan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the
petitioners submit that he shall not be pressing the application
and shall file an application before the learned Trial Court. The
learned Trial Court, is expected to pass an appropriate order
considering the grounds taken by the petitioners without being
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10183 of 2025(2) dt.05-02-2026
2/2
prejudiced by the withdrawal of the present application.
3. With the aforesaid liberty, the application stands
disposed of.
(Sourendra Pandey, J)
Gautam/-
U T
Checking your session…