Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kundan Kumar @ Kandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court denied bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered as Rupau P.S. Case No. 17 of 2024, where he is accused of gang raping the minor daughter of an informant. The charges include offences under Section 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused committed the rape sequentially, and most witnesses had already been examined. The High Court, noting the gravity of the alleged crime and the fact that the petitioner had been in custody since 31‑03‑2024, declined to grant bail. The application was dismissed, with the court clarifying that its observations are limited to the bail application and do not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused of gang rape of a minor under IPC 376(D) and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6, considering the seriousness of the offence and the stage of investigation.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • rape
  • gang rape
  • minor
  • POCSO Act
  • IPC 376(D)
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10307 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2024 Thana- RUPO District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Kundan Kumar @ Kandan Kumar S/O Rajendra Yadav Resident Of Village -
                 Jaila, P.S- Rupau, District- Nawada

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Rajesh Yadav S/O Late Bundi Yadav Resident Of Village - Jaila, P.S- Rupau,
                 District- Nawada

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   06-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rupau

                   P.S. Case No. 17 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable

                   under Sections 376(D) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4

                   and 6 of the POCSO Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the

                   co-accused persons are alleged to have committed rape on the

                   minor daughter of the informant one after another.

                                 4. The petitioner is in custody since 31.03.2024.

                                 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is accused of

                   gang rape against the minor daughter of the informant and
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10307 of 2025(7) dt.06-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                     almost all the witnesses have been examined, I am not inclined

                     to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                  7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                      (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.