Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Om Prakash SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Om Prakash Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Suppi P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting illegal liquor. The prosecution alleged that three bikers were carrying 132 litres of illicit liquor, two were apprehended, and the petitioner’s bike was among those used. The petitioner contended that he was merely the owner of the bike, had handed it over to a third party, and that no liquor was recovered from his possession, asserting that he was falsely implicated. He also relied on a prior decision (Cr. Misc. No. 79448 of 2024) where a co‑accused on similar facts was granted bail. The State opposed the bail, but the Court, after hearing both sides, granted anticipatory bail subject to surrender within four weeks, a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, and compliance with Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, Section 30(a).
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing, tampering with evidence, or influencing witnesses.
  • Whether the precedent of granting bail to a similarly situated co‑accused is applicable.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 30
  • bail precedent
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10326 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Om Prakash Singh Son of Digvijay Narain Singh Resident of Village -
                 Rampur Haripur, P.S. - Pupari, District - Sitamarhi.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has

                   been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024 instituted for

                   the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police

                   had a secret information that three bikers are carrying illegal

                   liquor. When the bikers were ordered to stop, bikers started

                   fleeing away. Two persons were apprehended and from these

                   bikers altogether 132 liters of liquor was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10326 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

          case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the

          petitioner is framed in this case because he is the owner of one

          of the bikes. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the

          petitioner. The petitioner has handed over his bike to one

          Amrendra Kumar who has misused the bike and was

          apprehended at the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

          further submitted that similarly situated co-accused has been

          granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 79448 of 2024.

          The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          of bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

          the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this

          Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner

          is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of

          four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender

          in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024, he will be

          enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

          ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10326 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-I,

                      Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under section

                      482(2) of B.N.S.S.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.