Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Khalis @ Md. Khalis Miya @ Khalis MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied because the court was not convinced of the petitioner’s innocence and considered the risk of reoffending given the commercial quantity of narcotics recovered.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Khalis, was arrested on 8 October 2025 in connection with an NDPS case involving the recovery of 203.800 kg of ganja. He sought bail, claiming innocence and that his name was implicated only through the confessional statement of a co-accused, with no incriminating material found on him. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the commercial quantity of the narcotic, the applicability of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and the petitioner’s alleged involvement as indicated by the co-accused’s confession. The court referred to Supreme Court precedents that require a belief in the petitioner’s innocence and a low risk of reoffending before granting bail in such cases. Concluding that the evidence did not establish the petitioner’s lack of knowledge or risk of future offences, the court refused the bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted in an NDPS case where a commercial quantity of narcotic is recovered and the petitioner’s alleged involvement is based solely on a co-accused’s confession.
  • Whether Section 37 of the NDPS Act precludes bail absent a belief that the petitioner is innocent and will not commit a similar offence.
  • How the Supreme Court decisions in State of Kerala v. Rajesh, Narcotic Control Bureau v. Mohit Aggarwal, and Union of India v. Ajay Kumar Singh influence bail decisions in similar NDPS cases.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • commercial quantity
  • confessional statement
  • co-accused
  • Section 37
  • narcotics
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10404 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2024 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Khalis @ Md. Khalis Miya @ Khalis Miya Son of Late Sainullah Miya
                 @ Sanaullah Miyan R/o Vilage - Charwa, P.S. - Ramgarhwa, District - East
                 Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the State            :      Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   02-04-2026                      Heard Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and Mr. Kalyan Shankar, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                  2.    Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   08.10.2025 in connection with NDPS Case No. 120 of 2024

                   arising out of Ramgharwa P.S. Case No. 322 of 2024 for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 22 of the

                   N.D.P.S. Act.

                                  3. The case relates to recovery of 203.800 Kgs. of

                   Ganja.

                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. He further submits that the petitioner is not named
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10404 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026
                                            2/4




          in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been transpired

          during investigation on the basis of confessional statement of

          co-accused person, namely, Munaf Miya @ Monaf Miya.

          Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that from

          perusal of the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that nothing

          incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of

          the petitioner and except the confession of co-accused person,

          no other cogent material has come during investigation to

          suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present

          occurrence and co-accused who has confessed the name of the

          petitioner has been granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this

          Court vide order dated 24.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4376

          of 2026 and the petitioner is in custody since 08.10.2025.

                         5.    Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on the

          other hand, on the basis of material available on record and case

          diary, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner

          and submits that altogether 203 Kgs. 800 grams of ganja was

          recovered from the bus in question and co-accused who has

          confessed the name of the petitioner has participated the crime

          in question and the recovered contraband is more than the

          commercial quantity, so there is embargo under Section 37 of

          the N.D.P.S. Act and apart from aforesaid the petitioner carries
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10404 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026
                                            3/4




          one more case of similar nature other than the present one.

                      6. The grant of bail in NDPS cases where the recovery

          of commercial quantity of narcotic is alleged is circumscribed

          under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985,

          Section 37 which says that before grant of bail, the Court must

          have reason to believe that petitioner has not committed the

          offence and in the event of release he would not commit similar

          offence.

                       7. The issue was considered by the Hon’ble Supreme

          Court in the case of State of Kerala and Ors. Vs. Rajesh and

          Ors. reported in (2020) 12 SCC, 122 as well as in the case of

          Narcotic Control Bureau Vs. Mohit Aggarwal reported in

          AIR 2022 SC 3444 and Union of India vs. Ajay Kumar Singh

          @ Pappu reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 3456 dated

          28.03.2023.

                      8. The recovery of huge quantity of Ganja recovered

          would not justify that the petitioner had no knowledge of the

          narcotic nor there is any material to substantiate that the

          petitioner would not commit such offence in the event of

          release.

                      9. Hence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner

          on bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 120 of 2024
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10404 of 2026(3) dt.02-04-2026
                                                           4/4




                         arising out of Ramgharwa P.S. Case No. 322 of 2024, pending

                         in the Court of learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Motihari,

                         East Champaran.

                                      10. Prayer is refused.



                                                                       (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.