Patna High Court
Pawan Singh @Pawan Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the application and disposed of it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Pawan Singh and Pramod Singh, filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding arising from PS case No. 377 of 2022. Their counsel sought permission to withdraw the application and to raise any points at a later stage. The Hon'ble Justice Praveen Kumar granted the requested permission, allowing the withdrawal. The court disposed of the application as withdrawn, expressly stating that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the case. Consequently, the proceedings on the substantive issues remain pending, but the specific application is no longer before the court.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw an application filed in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal miscellaneous proceeding
- procedural order
- court discretion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10406 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2022 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran
======================================================
1. Pawan Singh @Pawan Kumar Singh Son Of Binesh Singh Resident Of
Village -harpur Faridanpur, Ps- Taraiya Dist- Saran At Chapra
2. Pramod Singh Son Of Binesh Singh @ Vinesh Kumar Singh Resident Of
Village- Bochani Thokar No. 3, Ps- Gopalpur, Distt- Bhagalpur
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sandhya Devi Wife Of Jitendra Baitha Resident Of Village- Harlaschak, Ps-
Taraiya Distt- Saran At Chapra
... ... Opposite Parties
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kundan Kumar Sinha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners
fairly submits that he would be filing appropriate application at
the appropriate time of the proceeding and seeks permission to
withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the available
points to him at such stage.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This application is disposed of as withdrawn with
the liberty aforesaid.
4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed
any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-
U T
Checking your session…