Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subodh Kumar Shahni @ Subodh Kumar ShahiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to specified monetary and procedural conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Subodh Kumar Shahni, the owner of a truck, was implicated in a case (Koilwar P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024) alleging violation of Sections 56(1) and 56(2) of the Bihar Mineral (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Amendment Rules, 2021, resulting in a loss of Rs.2,73,631 to the government. He filed an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail, claiming he was unaware of any wrongdoing by his driver and Khalasi. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the loss occurred due to the petitioner’s truck. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted anticipatory bail subject to the petitioner depositing the loss amount within six weeks, furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000, and complying with verification of his criminal antecedents. The order also stipulated that the trial court may cancel the bail if the petitioner is found to have concealed any prior criminal record. The bail bond acceptance shall not be delayed for the purpose of verification.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 to a person alleged to have violated the Bihar Mineral Amendment Rules, 2021.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged ownership of the truck makes him liable for the alleged loss and justifies denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • illegal mining
  • Bihar Mineral Rules
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • bail conditions
  • loss to exchequer

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10472 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2024 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Subodh Kumar Shahni @ Subodh Kumar Shahi S/o Ramekbal Shahi Resident
                 of Village and Post - Baruraj, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur, State -
                 Bihar, Pin Code - 843132.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shiv Pratap, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-03-2026                        Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and

                   Learned APP for the State.

                                2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has

                   been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                   Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS, 2023’) for

                   grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehends arrest

                   in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024, lodged

                   on 18.05.2024, under Sections 56(1)/56(2) of the Bihar Mineral

                   (Concession, Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and

                   Storage) Amendment Rules, 2021.

                                3. As per the prosecution, the allegation made in the

                   FIR is relating to violation made under Bihar Mineral

                   Amendment Rules, 2021 and the seized sand were subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10472 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                            2/3




          theft by which loss of government exchequer at the tune of

          Rs.2,73,631/- took place.

                       4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel

          submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he has

          unnecessarily been made in this case. He is the owner of the

          truck and he is completely unaware that what driver and Khalasi

          have done.

                       5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand,

          opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that due

          to the petitioner’s truck, the loss to the government had taken

          place at the tune of Rs.2,73,631/-.

                       6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case,

          let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail

          subject to payment of Rs.2,73,631/- before the concerned

          department within six weeks from today, in the event of arrest

          or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 6

          weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/-

          (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of

          the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara,

          in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024, subject

          to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.
         Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10472 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                     3/3




                                7. And further condition that the Trial Court shall

                   verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                   any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                   criminal antecedent, the Trial Court shall take step for

                   cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.                However, the

                   acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order

                   shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                   verification.

                                8. It is made clear that at the time of release of truck,

                   the deposited amount by the petitioner shall also be taken into

                   consideration.



                                                                        (Dr. Anshuman, J)
    Mkr./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.