Patna High Court
SHWETA SINGHversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Shweta Singh filed an application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding (Criminal Misc. No.10494 of 2023) seeking to challenge a subsequent development in the case against the State of Bihar and Vishal Raj. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Ashok Kumar, argued for the continuation of the application. During the hearing on 5 February 2026, counsel for the petitioner requested to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and noted that the petitioner wished to abandon the challenge. Consequently, the court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedural disposition when a petitioner seeks to withdraw an application pending before the court?
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10494 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1195 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Patna
======================================================
SHWETA SINGH Daughter of Rajeshwar Singh Proprietor of M/s Shweta
Bharat Gas Gramin Vitrak, P.O.- Ishuapur, P.S.- Ishuapur Chapra, District -
Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Vishal Raj Son of Mr. Alok Kumar Singh Prop. of M/s Raj Traders
Pirmohani Chowk (Near New Jaipur Hotel), Chura Mill Lane O.P. and P.S.-
Kadamkuan, District - Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP
For the O.P No.2 : Ms. Aditi Medha, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
6 05-02-2026 After some arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner prays for withdrawal of present application in order to
challenge the subsequent development which has taken place in
the case.
2. The present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Harsh/-
U T
Checking your session…