Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Irsad @ Md. IrshadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, directing the execution of a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, a driver for Road King Transport, was arrested after a truck was found carrying 4620 litres of codeine cough syrup, leading to a charge under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the consignment was loaded by Windlas Biotech Limited for Vishnu Medical Agency, supported by purchase orders, GST invoices, E‑way bills, and a laboratory report showing the codeine content within legal limits. He also highlighted his valid driving licence, lack of prior criminal record, and that he had been in custody since 23‑11‑2025 with a chargesheet already filed. The State opposed bail, but the Court, after considering the documents and the circumstances, found no compelling reason to deny bail. Consequently, the Court ordered that the petitioner be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the charge under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016
  • Whether the evidence shows that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the alleged contravention

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • codeine cough syrup
  • false implication
  • driver liability
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10506 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Irsad @ Md. Irshad S/o Marhum Ajij Alam @ Mahruf Ajij Alam @ Md.
                 Ajig Alam R/o Village- Rani Mau, P.O. - Indauli, P.S.- Patranga, District-
                 Faijabad, Uttar Pradesh

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate
                                                    Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate
                                                    Mr. Roop Kishan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                   Heard Mr. P.N. Shahi, learned Senior counsel for the

                   petitioner and learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Excise (Sadar) P.S. Case

                   no. 337 of 2025 registered under section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, on the truck in

                   question being stopped for search, it transpired that 330 case of

                   codeine cough syrup (Wiscof cough syrup) was found loaded,

                   the total quantity being 4620 litres. The petitioner who happens

                   to be the driver of the vehicle was taken into custody.

                                 4. It is submitted by learned Senior counsel appearing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10506 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                            2/3




          for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the

          case only for the reason that he happens to be the driver of the

          vehicle of the transport agency Road King Transport. Referring to

          the contents of the petition and the documents brought on record by

          way of annexure, it is submitted that 330 case of Wiscof codeine

          cough syrup consignment was loaded by the company Windlas

          Biotech Limited, Dehradun, Uttarakhand pursuant to receipt of

          purchase order dated 13.11.2025 (Annexure-P/2). The Windlas

          Biotech Limited on receipt of the order sent the goods to Vishnu

          Medical Agency and generated two GST invoices with the

          consignees name being Vishnu Medical Agency. Two E-way bills

          were also generated which has been brought on record as Annexure-

          P/3 to the petition. Referring to the license of the manufacturer

          Windlas Biotech Limited, Uttarakhand, it is submitted that an

          agreement was entered into on 31.5.2025 and that Vishnu Medical

          Agency, Sasaram happens to be the C & F of Windlas Biotech

          Limited.

                       5. It is further submitted that the cough syrup seized was

          tested by the agency and a copy of the report of the Bihar Drugs

          Control Laboratory, Government of Bihar contained in Memo no.

          4181 dated 31.12.2025 (Annexure-P/9) has been brought on record

          to show that the contents of the codeine etc found therein conforms
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10506 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     to the prescribed limit. It is further submitted that the petitioner was

                     holding a valid driving license, he is in custody since 23.11.2025 and

                     has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the

                     case.

                                  6. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the

                     petitioner being in custody since 23.11.2025, chargesheet having

                     been submitted in the case, his not having any criminal

                     antecedent and specially the documents brought on record with

                     respect to the agreement etc of the goods loaded on the truck

                     and referred to herein above, the Court directs the petitioner to be

                     enlarged on bail in connection with Excise (Sadar) P.S. Case no. 337

                     of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                     Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise-II,

                     Bhojpur at Ara.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.