Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar, was arrested on 24 March 2025 in connection with the alleged murder of his wife by firing a gun. He is charged under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner applied for bail before the High Court. Considering the seriousness of the accusation, the Court rejected the bail application. However, the Court directed the trial court to expedite the trial given the petitioner’s continued custody.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to an accused charged with murder under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • Arms Act
  • Section 27
  • Section 103(1)
  • criminal procedure
  • trial expedite

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10570 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2025 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi
                    ======================================================
                    Pankaj Kumar Son of Badelal Mahto @ Barelal Mahto R/o - Bahilwara Tola
                    Ward no. 01, Village- Sumuhutti, P.S. - Garha ( Runisaidpur), District -
                    Sitamarhi, Bihar.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                    The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Ankur Apurv Singh
                    For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Umesh Lal Verma
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                          ORAL ORDER

2      18-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                      A.P.P. for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                      offence under Section 103(1) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of the

                      Arms Act.

                                   3. Petitioner is husband of the deceased and is alleged

                      to have killed his wife by firing gun-shot.

                                   4. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer

                      for bail of petitioner is rejected. However, since petitioner is in

                      custody since 24.03.2025, the learned trial court is directed to

                      expedite the trial.



                                                     (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.