Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Alok Kumar Pandit @ PintuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court ordered the petitioner to be released on bail.

Summary

Alok Kumar Pandit was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute incident where he was alleged to have assaulted the informant with an iron rod, leading to charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution claimed he, along with others, entered the informant's ancestral field armed with lathis and caused a lacerated wound to the head. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedents, and that the injury was minor with no repeated blows. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the court considered the lack of prior record, the nature of the injury, and the petitioner’s custody since October 2025, and decided to enlarge bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite charges under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 126(2), 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 303(2), 351(2), 352

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • injury
  • no prior record
  • B.N.S. sections

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10603 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Alok Kumar Pandit @ Pintu, Son of Shri Kishor Pandit, Resident of Village-
                 Gaddighat, Ward No. 14, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Rupauli P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2),

                   118(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioner along with others being armed with lathi, danda arrived

                   and started ploughing the field which was the ancestral property of

                   the informant. It is specifically alleged that this petitioner has

                   assaulted with iron rod on the head of the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further

                   been submitted that there is also a counter version of this case.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10603 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       There is land dispute between the parties and from perusal of the

                       injury report of the informant, it is clear that he has received one

                       lacerated wound on occipital region measuring 3”x1/4”x1/16” in

                       diameter. The opinion regarding the injury           is reserved. Other

                       injuries are bruise. It has also been submitted that there is

                       allegation against other accused persons also. Only allegation

                       against this petitioner is that he has assaulted with iron rod on the

                       head. It has further been submitted that there is no repetition of

                       blow. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is

                       languishing in judicial custody since 01.10.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                       opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                       of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                       like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. I/C,

                       Purnea in Rupauli in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 184 of

                       2025.


                                                           (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.