Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

Rakesh Kumar Jaiswal, a shopkeeper, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 22(b) of the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing pharmaceutical formulations containing codeine phosphate, nitrazepam, tramadol hydrochloride and alprazolam. The petitioner contended that the quantity seized was less than commercial, he had no prior criminal record, and there was a three‑day delay between the FIR and his arrest. The State opposed his bail application. After hearing both sides, the Court considered the nature of the contraband, the delay in arrest, and the petitioner’s clean record, and decided to grant bail. He was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount. The order was pronounced by Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey of the Patna High Court.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting bail in a case under Section 22(b) of the NDPS Act where the seized quantity is more than a small amount but less than commercial quantity?
  • Does the three‑day delay between the FIR and the arrest justify bail?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • Section 22(b)
  • drug possession
  • delay in arrest
  • shopkeeper
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10719 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-432 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East
                                                        Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Jaiswal, S/o Shankar Prasad @ Hari
                 Shankar Prasad, Resident of Village- Ghorasahan, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District-
                 East Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Shambhavi Priya, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Naveen Kumar Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No.432 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 22(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from

                   the shop of the petitioner, pharmaceutical formulations

                   comprising           Codeine    Phosphate,       Nitrazepam,        Tramadol

                   Hydrochloride and Alprazolam were recovered.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10719 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       case. The alleged contraband which is said to be recovered is

                       though more than small quantity but is much less than

                       commercial quantity that is why a case under Section 22(b) of

                       the N.D.P.S. has been registered against the petitioner. It has

                       further been submitted that petitioner is a shopkeeper. It has also

                       been submitted that he was arrested on 19.12.2025 whereas the

                       F.I.R. was lodged on 22.12.2025, there is delay of three days.

                       He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in

                       judicial custody since 22.12.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       Sessions Judge/Special Judge, East Champaran at Motihari in

                       connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 432 of 2025.


                                                       (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.