Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravi Ranjan Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Jat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The criminal appeal (SJ) No. 114 of 2025 is restored to its original file.

Summary

The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, filed a restoration petition seeking to revive Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 114 of 2025, which had been previously dismissed. The State of Bihar opposed the restoration. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the appeal should be reinstated to its original file. The Court, after considering the restoration petition, allowed the prayer and ordered the appeal to be restored. Consequently, the miscellaneous petition (Cr. Misc. No. 10723 of 2026) was disposed, and the Court granted the petitioner an additional four weeks to comply with the earlier order dated 11-08-2025.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal appeal (SJ) No. 114 of 2025 can be restored to its original file
  • Whether additional time can be granted to comply with the order dated 11-08-2025

Subjects

  • criminal appeal
  • restoration
  • procedure
  • time extension

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10723 of 2026
                                                  In
                                    CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.114 of 2025
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2024 Thana- GURARU District- Gaya
                    ======================================================
                    Ravi Ranjan Kumar @ Ravi Ranjan @ Jat Yadav Son of Ramswarup Yadav
                    R/o Village - Bandaul, Ps- Gurau, Dist- Gaya
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
               1.    The State of Bihar
               2.    Madan Das Son of Late Rajdev Das Resident of Village- Bara, Ps- Guraru,
                     Dist- Gaya
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate
                    For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                          ORAL ORDER

2     25-02-2026                      Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the

                      petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned APP for the State.

                                    2. For the reasons stated in the restoration petition, the

                      prayer for restoration is allowed and Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 114 of

                      2025 is restored to its original file.

                                   3. Cr. Misc. No. 10723 of 2026 stands disposed of.

                                   4. As prayed on behalf of the petitioner, four weeks’

                      further time is allowed to comply the order dated 11.08.2025

                      passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 114 of 2025.



                                                                    (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.