Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shravan Das @ Sharwan Kumar @ Sharwan DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Shravan Das applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act alleging recovery of 50 litres of illegal country-made liquor. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from a Palani, not from his conscious physical possession, and that he has only one prior case. The State opposed the bail. The court noted the lack of physical possession, the petitioner’s denial of ownership of the Palani, and his single antecedent, and therefore inclined to grant anticipatory bail. The court ordered release on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. and Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita when the accused has no conscious physical possession of the alleged contraband.
  • Whether the alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act warrants denial of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • Section 482 Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10838 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- GANGABRIDGE District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Shravan Das @ Sharwan Kumar @ Sharwan Das Son of Machhu Das
                 Resident of Village - Terasiya, Police Station - Ganga Bridge, District -
                 Vaishali.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Suruchi Anand, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest

                   in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections

                   30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in connection with

                   Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No.189 of 2025.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of

                   recovery of 50 liters of illegal country made liquor from a

                   gunny bag. Further submits that no recovery has been made

                   from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner and it

                   has been recovered from a Palani.

                                4. The learned APP for the State opposes the

                   anticipatory bail application.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10838 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                      2/2




                                 5. Considering the fact that no recovery has been

                    made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner

                    and also taking into account that it has been recovered from a

                    Palani which the petitioner denies to be his, and also taking into

                    account the fact that the petitioner has only one antecedent, this

                    Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                                 6. Accordingly, the petitioner above-named, in the

                    event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

                    within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail

                    on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

                    Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                    satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1-

                    cum-District & Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in

                    connection with Ganga Bridge P.S. Case No.189 of 2025,

                    subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                    Cr.P.C./Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha

                    Sanhita.


                                             (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

Prakash Narayan
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.