Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalsa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court refused to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Lassa Devi applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Mirganj P.S. Case No.292 of 2025) alleging fraud under Sections 316 and 318 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleges she collected weekly contributions from members of a women’s self‑help group, promised to deposit them in a bank, and misappropriated a loan of Rs.2 lakh obtained by the group. The petitioner contended she was innocent, highlighted a three‑month delay in filing the FIR, and claimed no evidence of the alleged collections. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the fraud allegations. The court examined the gravity of the offence, the lack of material evidence, and the delay, and concluded that the seriousness warranted denial of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 316 and 318 of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the three‑month delay in lodging the FIR and absence of receipts justify granting bail
  • Whether the alleged seriousness of the fraud offence precludes anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • fraud
  • self‑help group
  • usurpation of funds
  • Sections 316, 318 B.N.S.
  • delay in FIR
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10870 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2025 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Lalsa Devi D/o Late Ramanand Chaudhary Ro village- Pipra khaas, PS-
                 Mirganj, Dist- Gopalganj Bihar
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Sumit Shekhar Pandey, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Rina Sinha, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection

                   with Mirganj P.S. Case No.292 of 2025, registered for the

                   offence under Sections 316, 318 of the B.N.S.

                                3. Prosecution story in brief is that Lalsa Devi met

                   with some illiterate women and encourage them to form

                   Shankar Jeevika Women Self Help Group. After forming group,

                   Kavita Devi was made Chairman. Further Lalsa Devi used to

                   take Rs. 10 per week from each member of the group and told

                   them that she deposit the money in bank. She also assisted in

                   opening account on the name of group in SBI. Thereafter, the

                   said self help group got a loan amount of Rs 2 lacs from SBI,

                   which they received and gave it to Lalsa Devi to deposit the

                   money. Further Lalsa Devi through fraud and deceit did not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10870 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/3




          deposit the said amount in the bank nor she give the said amount

          to member of the self help group. She usurped the said amount

          of self help group.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has

          falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the

          petitioner further submits that there is delay of around three

          months in lodging of the FIR. Further submits that there is no

          any receipt pertaining to the collection of Rs.10/- from the

          members of the said Self-Help Group nor is there any material

          available on record, which could show that Rs.10/-was ever

          collected from the members in the name of Self-Help Group.

          Learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that petitioner

          has nothing to do with the alleged sum of Rs.2,00,000/- as the

          petitioner is not involved in the possession of any such money at

          any point of time and it is only at the instance of the local

          village politics.

                       5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail

          application.

                       6. It is alleged that Lalsa Devi met the other eleven

          ladies including the petitioner and encouraged them to form

          Shankar Jivika Women Self Help Group. After forming the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10870 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                                      3/3




                    group, Kavita Devi was made the Chairperson. It is further

                    alleged that Lalsa Devi i.e. the petitioner used to take Rs.10/-

                    per week from each member of the group and told them that she

                    would deposit the money in Bank. She also alleged to have

                    assisted in opening bank account on the name of Group in State

                    Bank of India. It is further alleged that thereafter the Self Help

                    Group got a loan amount from SBI, which was received and

                    given to the petitioner i.e. Lalsa Devi to deposit the money. It is

                    further alleged that Lalsa Devi through fraud and receipt did not

                    deposit the said amount in the Bank nor did she give the said

                    amount to member of the Self Help Group. She is said to have

                    usurp the said amount of the Self Help Group.

                                  8. Considering the seriousness of the allegation and

                    nature of the offence committed by the petitioner, this Court is

                    not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the

                    petitioner.

                                  9. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    rejected.


                                             (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

Prakash Narayan
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.