Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalli Choudhary @ Lali ChoudharyversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Lalli Choudhary applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly selling 26 litres of wine. The prosecution claimed that secret information linked the petitioner to the sale, while the petitioner contended he was falsely implicated, had no possession of the wine, and possessed no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, granted anticipatory bail subject to a cash bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and several conditions, including personal attendance before the trial court and verification of criminal antecedents. The order clarified that any observations made would not affect the trial. The bail is to be surrendered if conditions are breached.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
  • Whether the High Court can impose conditions under its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30
  • Criminal Procedure
  • High Court inherent powers
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11052 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2025 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Lalli Choudhary @ Lali Choudhary S/O Bindu Choudhary R/O Village
                 -Mirjapur, P.s.- Awatar Nagar, Dist.- Saran.
                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State Of Bihar Patna
                                                              ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest

                   in connection with Awtar Nagar P.S. Case No. 277 of 2025

                   instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, allegation against the

                   petitioner is that the police on secret information came to know

                   that the named three accused persons including the petitioner

                   were selling 26 liters of wine near the poultry farm.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated. He was not apprehended

                   at the place of occurrence. It has been submitted that no

                   recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the

                   petitioner and admittedly the recovery has been made from a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11052 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                            2/3




          bush which does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner has

          no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is

          directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks

          from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on

          his/her/their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each

          to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise 1, Saran

          at Chapra in connection with Awtar Nagar P.S. Case No. 277 of

          2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482

          of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:-

                       (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

          petitioner;

                       (ii) the petitioner will remain present on each and

          every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the

          learned Trial Court;

                       (iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in

          violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner

          will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11052 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                                   (iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal

                      antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found

                      that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the

                      court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the

                      petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the

                      above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the

                      same on in the name of verification.

                                   (v) the Court below shall verify the criminal

                      antecedent of the petitioner registered for the offence under

                      Section 30A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and, in case

                      at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for the purpose of the same or in the name

                      of verification.

                                   7.It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

                      in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                               (Sourendra Pandey, J)
krishna/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.