Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Deepak Mandal @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNS.

Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Mandal, a government railway employee, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 50 of 2025 alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS). He argued that the dispute arose from the informant's buffalo grazing on his maize crop, resulting in a simple head injury to the informant during a spontaneous scuffle, and that the incident was not pre‑planned. The State opposed the bail, but the court considered the petitioner’s clean criminal record, the nature of the injury, and the circumstances of the altercation. Accordingly, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within six weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the BNS. The order was pronounced by Justice Shailendra Singh.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the facts and the nature of the alleged offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Bihar Negotiable Statutes
  • FIR
  • government employee
  • simple injury
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11092 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2025 Thana- SHAHKUND District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Deepak Mandal @ Deepak Kumar, Son of Late Radhe Mandal, R/o Village -
                 Gorgama, P.S. - Shahkund, Dist. - Bhagalpur..

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Anupa Nand Jha, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Parmanand Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-02-2026                  1. Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Shahkund P. S. Case No. 50 of 2025 registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352,

                   351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

                                3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's

                   counsel are that the FIR itself shows that a dispute arose in

                   between both the parties owing to grazing of the petitioner's

                   maize crop by buffalo of the informant and on the head of the

                   informant, only one injury was found which has been opined to

                   be simple in nature, in fact, the informant fell down on the ground

                   during the course of scuffling, resulting in the said head injury to

                   him and further, the prosecution story clearly shows that the

                   alleged incident was not pre-planned and occurred in the spur of
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11092 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                        moment. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner bears no

                        criminal antecedent and is a government employee serving in

                        the Railway Department.

                                     4. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed

                        the bail prayer of the petitioner.

                                     5. In the facts and circumstances of this case and

                        considering the aforesaid submissions, the pleas taken by the

                        petitioner in his application and coupled with the genesis of the

                        occurrence and fair and clean antecedent of the petitioner as

                        well as the nature of the injury of the informant, this court is

                        inclined to grant the relief of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, let

                        the petitioner named-above, in the event of his arrest/surrender

                        before the learned court below within a period of six weeks

                        from today, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with

                        Shahkund P. S. Case No. 50 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                        Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of

                        the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned,

                        subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                        the BNSS.

                                                  (Shailendra Singh, J)
Rajiv/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.