Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md Sahbaj @ Md. ShahbajversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Sahbaj, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Puraini PS Case No. 155 of 2025) under sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and sections 25(1‑B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, based on the testimony of co‑accused who named him. He argued that he has no criminal antecedent and that a similarly situated individual had been granted relief in a coordinate bench decision. The State opposed, stating that the co‑accused had identified the petitioner. The Court, noting the recovery of the weapon from the named accused and the precedent of relief in Cr. Misc. No. 82816 of 2025, decided to extend anticipatory bail with stringent conditions, including a bail bond, sureties, regular appearances before the trial court and police, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence. The order directs that the petitioner be released on bail if arrested or surrendered within four weeks, subject to the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the present case
  • Whether the precedent of relief granted to a similarly situated person is applicable

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Arms Act
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure
  • pre‑cedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1126 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2025 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura
                 ======================================================
                 Md Sahbaj @ Md. Shahbaj Son of Md. Afjal R/o - Auray, P.S. - Puraini,
                 District - Madhepura.
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Puraini P.S. Case No. 155 of 2025 for the offence

                   under sections 310(4) and 310(5) of the BNS and Sections 25(1-

                   B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act lodged on 09.08.2025 by the

                   informant, Kundan Paswan.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that he departed on a morning patrolling when received

                   information about some miscreants making plan to commit crime.

                   Accordingly, the place was raided and three accused persons

                   apprehended namely Md. Fahim, Mr. Aftab and Md. Sonu. They

                   confessed to making plan to commit a crime and upon search,

                   country-made revolver and mobile recovered beside a motorcycle.

                   They gave the names of the persons who escaped, the petitioner

                   being one of them. This led to the FIR.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has

                   no criminal antecedent and only because the arrested persons due
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1126 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          to enmity named him, got implicated. The further submission is

          that one other similar situate person (Md. Mokim) has been

          granted relief by a Coordinate Bench in Cr. Misc. No. 82816 of

          2025.

                       5. Let the same be kept on record.

                       6. Learned APP, Mr. Bharat Bhushan opposes the prayer

          submitting that the arrested persons have named him.

                       7. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as

          also that the recovery/seizure is from the named accused, they

          have given the name of this petitioner and one similarly situated

          person has been granted relief by the Coordinate Bench, as stated

          above, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend him the

          privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions.

                       8. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt

          of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

          of learned ACJM-1, Udakishunganj, Madhepura in connection

          with Puraini P.S. Case No. 155 of 2025 subject to the following

          conditions:

                       (i)   one    of    the     bailor      should   be   the   family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhaar Card/Voter ID Card/Pan Card/Driving
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1126 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    License) to show his/her bona fide;

                                 (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                    before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                    dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail

                    bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                 (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

                    police station every month for six months to mark his attendance

                    and after the end of the period, the certificate shall be submitted

                    before the Trial Court failing which steps shall be taken for the

                    cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                 (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                    promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                    failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                    cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                 (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                    criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to

                    take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.