Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satya narayan Oraon @ Satya Narayan UronvversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Satya Narayan Oraon, a Sub‑Post Master at Forbesganj, was implicated in an FIR (Case No. 281 of 2025) for alleged misappropriation of Rs 9,91,634, alleged under sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS. The petitioner filed a petition for anticipatory bail, submitting that the disputed amount had been deposited in the Sub‑Post Office and that he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail, maintaining the allegation of misappropriation. The Court, after considering the submissions and the deposit of the amount, granted anticipatory bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties, imposing conditions such as appearance before the trial court, non‑tampering with witnesses, and refraining from further offences. The order directed that bail would be effective upon arrest or surrender within four weeks of the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the FIR for alleged misappropriation under sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS
  • Whether the deposit of the alleged misappropriated amount and the petitioner’s clean record justify the grant of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • misappropriation
  • post office
  • FIR
  • criminal antecedent
  • bail conditions
  • sections 316(5) BNS
  • sections 318(4) BNS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1131 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2025 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Satya narayan Oraon @ Satya Narayan Uronv Son of Dharmendeo Oraon
                 Resident of Village - Barhara Ward no. 09, Police Station - Forbesganj,
                 Narpatganj, District - Araria.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025 for the

                   offence under sections 316(5) and 318(4) of the BNS lodged on

                   06.06.2025 by the informant, Md. Jahangir Alam.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that the petitioner while posted as Sub-Post Master at

                   Forbesganj misappropriated a sum of Rs. 9,91,634 which was

                   accepted by him in writing that the said amount is not available

                   in the Sub Post Office. This led to the FIR.

                                4. With the help of paragraph no. 9, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner submits that the amount in question (Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1131 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          9,91,634) has been deposited in the amount of Sub Post Office,

          SR Forbesganj and the receipt dated 05.08.2025 has been

          annexed as annexure-P/2 to the petition.

                       5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that

          allegation of misappropriation is there.

                       6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties

          as also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, FIR is

          there, he shall be facing the music and the amount in question

          has been deposited, in that background, this Court is inclined to

          extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail with conditions.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of

          arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the

          receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in

          connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 281 of 2025 subject

          to the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhaar Card/Voter ID Card/Pan Card/Driving

          License) to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1131 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                    dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

                    bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                 (iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                    promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                    failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                    cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                 (iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                    criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                    to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.