Patna High Court
RAMDEO SINGHversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Ramdeo Singh and his sons, filed a criminal miscellaneous application against the State of Bihar and Mukesh Kumar. During the hearing on 16-03-2026, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after granting permission, dismissed the application as withdrawn. No merits of the underlying dispute were examined or expressed upon by the Court. The order clarifies that the Court has not formed any opinion on the substantive issues of the case.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners' application should be entertained or allowed to be withdrawn
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- procedural dismissal
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11357 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-405 Year-2018 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria
======================================================
1. Ramdeo Singh Son Of Late Saukhi Singh R/O-Bahadurpur, Ward No. 10,
P.S.-ALAULI, Distt.-KHAGARIA
2. Raja Kumar @ Rajaritesh Kumar Son Of Ramdeo Singh R/O-Bahadurpur,
Ward No. 10, P.S.-ALAULI, Distt.-KHAGARIA
3. Anuj Kumar Son Of Ramdeo Singh R/O-Bahadurpur, Ward No. 10, P.S.-
ALAULI, Distt.-KHAGARIA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Mukesh Kumar Son Of Ramchandra Ray R/O-Bahadurpur, P.S.-alauli,
Distt.-khagaria
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
Checking your session…