Patna High Court
Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay SharmaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners – Dhananjay Kumar, Rakesh Sharma, Pappu Sharma and Amit Kumar – filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking liberty to raise all points at the time of framing of charge in a case pending before the Patna High Court. They later moved the court for permission to withdraw that application. The learned counsel for the petitioners was allowed to withdraw, and the court dismissed the application as withdrawn, expressly stating that it did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying criminal case. No substantive issues of law were decided beyond the procedural request. The order leaves the petitioners free to raise any points when the charge is framed.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may permit the withdrawal of the petitioners' application and dismiss it as withdrawn?
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- charge framing
- procedural order
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11394 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2020 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya
======================================================
1. Dhananjay Kumar @ Dhananjay Sharma S/O Kedar Singh R/O Vishnupath
Road, Vill - Brahmani Ghat, P.O. Gpo, P.S. - Vishnupad, Distt. - Gaya
2. Rakesh Sharma @ Rakesh Kumar S/O Kedar Singh R/O Vishnupath Road,
Vill - Brahmani Ghat, P.O. Gpo, P.S. - Vishnupad, Distt. - Gaya
3. Pappu Sharma @ Vijay Kumar S/O Kedar Singh R/O Vishnupath Road, Vill
- Brahmani Ghat, P.O. Gpo, P.S. - Vishnupad, Distt. - Gaya
4. Amit Kumar @ Amit Sharma S/O Dhananjay Kumar R/O Vishnupath Road,
Vill - Brahmani Ghat, P.O. Gpo, P.S. - Vishnupad, Distt. - Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vardaan Mangalam, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with
liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points at the time of
framing of charge.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioners.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
Checking your session…