Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The provisional bail granted to the petitioner is confirmed.

Summary

Chintu Kumar, the petitioner, was implicated in a criminal case (PS Case No. 204 of 2025) and applied for bail. A coordinate bench of the Patna High Court had earlier granted him provisional bail on 1 April 2026. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, sought confirmation of this provisional bail. The State, represented by Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, opposed the confirmation. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma examined the matter and, finding no reason to disturb the earlier order, confirmed the provisional bail. Consequently, the bail petition was disposed, leaving the petitioner on bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether the provisional bail granted by the coordinate bench should be confirmed

Subjects

  • bail
  • provisional bail
  • criminal procedure
  • High Court
  • Patna

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11490 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna
                    ======================================================
                    Chintu Kumar Son of Chandrashekhar Paswan @ Chandeshwar Paswan @
                    Chandeswar Paswan Resident of Village - Chhotaki Kharwa, P.S.- Dulhin
                    Bazar, District - Patna.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
               1.   The State of Bihar
               2.   X Son of Sukhalu Ram Resident of Village - Chhotaki Kharwa, P.O.- Lala
                    Bhadsara, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna, Pin Code - 801102.

                                                           ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                    For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                          ORAL ORDER

4    29-04-2026                    Heard Mr.Ashok Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for

                      the petitioner and Mr.Mohammad Sufyan,                    learned A.P.P. for

                      the State.

                                   2. The provisional bail granted to the petitioner by a

                      Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide order dated

                      01.04.2026 is hereby confirmed.

                                   3. Accordingly, the present bail petition stands

                      disposed of.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.