Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raja KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners with conditions, finding no sufficient ground to deny bail.

Summary

The petitioners, Raja Kumar and Golu Kumar, were arrested in connection with a Maheshkhunt police case alleging that they obstructed a road and assaulted an army personnel, with one of them allegedly stabbing the informant. They sought regular bail, claiming innocence, clean antecedents, and willingness to comply with court conditions, while the State opposed the bail. The court noted that both petitioners had been in custody for several months, the charge‑sheet had already been filed, and there was no risk of absconding or tampering with evidence. Considering these factors, the court ordered bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding presence in court and conduct. Consequently, the petition for bail was allowed, and the petitioners were directed to be released subject to the stipulated conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail despite the serious offences alleged under the Indian Penal Code.

Legislation cited

  • Indian Penal Code — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351, 351(2), 351(3), 352

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • criminal procedure
  • court conditions
  • pre‑trial detention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11710 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2025 Thana- MAHESHKHUNT District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
           1.     Raja Kumar Son of Nandlal Paswan Resident Of Village- Kanhaiya Tola
                  (Maheshkhunt) Ps- Maheshkhunt District- Khagariya
           2.    Golu Kumar @ Vishal Kumar Son of Wakil Paswan Resident Of Village-
                 Kanhaiya Tola (Maheshkhunt) Ps- Maheshkhunt District- Khagariya

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Rakesh Mohan Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Kalyan Shankar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-03-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with

                   Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025, registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2),

                   118(1), 109, 352, 351, 351(2), 351(3) of BNS.

                                3. As per the FIR, the case is that on 12.12.2025 at

                   about 4:00 p.m., two boys (the petitioners) had blocked the road.

                   When the informant, an army personnel, asked them to clear the

                   passage, they abused and assaulted him and one of them stabbed

                   him. Petitioner no. 1 was apprehended at the spot, while petitioner

                   no. 2 fled away.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11710 of 2026(3) dt.19-03-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case.

          The allegations are general and omnibus. There is case and counter

          case. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent. Petitioner no.

          1 is in custody since 13.12.2025 and petitioner no. 2 is in custody

          since 25.12.2025. He is a man of means and there is no chance of

          his absconding and tampering with the evidence. He further

          submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by the conditions

          which may be imposed by this Court.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

          prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the fact that petitioner no. 1 is in custody

          since 13.02.2025 and petitioner no. 2 is in custody since

          25.12.2025 and both the petitioners are of clean antecedents and

          further taking note of the fact that charge-sheet has already been

          filed against both the petitioners on 27.02.2026, thereby indicating

          that investigation is no longer pending, let the petitioners above

          named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond

          of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below

          where the case is pending/successor court in connection with

          Maheshkhunt P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                       (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11710 of 2026(3) dt.19-03-2026
                                                       3/3




                     relative.

                                   (ⅱ) The petitioner shall remain physically present in

                     Court on each date of the trial.

                                  (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates without

                     substantial reason or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail

                     bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court

                     concerned.

                                  (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature

                     of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for

                     cancellation of his bail bond.

                                  (v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal

                     antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that

                     the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court

                     below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

                     However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the above-

                     mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name

                     of verification.

                                   7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.



                                              (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kundan/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.