Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sonamati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioners, directing them to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each.

Summary

The petitioners, Sonamati Devi and Sanju Devi, applied for bail in a case (Choutarwa P.S. Case No. 162 of 2025) involving alleged assault and homicide under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with others, participated in assaulting the informant’s husband, resulting in his death. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedents, and that the allegations against them were vague and non‑specific, noting that similarly situated co‑accused had previously been granted bail. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the court found the petitioners’ arguments persuasive and ordered that they be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners accused under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109 and 103 of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the nature of the allegations (general and omnibus) justifies the grant of bail.
  • Whether precedent of bail granted to similarly situated co‑accused influences the decision.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 103, 109, 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3)

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • false implication
  • women
  • surety
  • judicial custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11787 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2025 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sonamati Devi, W/O Jugeshwar Singh @ Yogeshwar Singh, R/O Village -
                  Jaini Tola, P.S.- Choutarwa, Dist.- West Champaran.
           2.     Sanju Devi, W/O Mukesh Singh, R/O Village - Jaini Tola, P.S.- Choutarwa,
                  Dist.- West Champaran.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection

                   with Choutarwa P.S. Case No. 162 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2),

                   115(2), 117(2), 109 and 103 of the B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioners along with others have assaulted the husband of the

                   informant. There is specific allegation against Ramesh Singh

                   who has assaulted with a farsa on the head of the informant’s

                   husband due to which he died.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11787 of 2026(2) dt.18-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this

                       case. The nature of allegation against these petitioners is general

                       and omnibus. Moreover, the petitioners are ladies and no overt

                       act is alleged against them. They are having no criminal

                       antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since

                       16.12.2025. It has also been submitted that similarly situated co-

                       accused persons have been granted bail by this Court vide Cr.

                       Misc. No. 67495 of 2025.

                                    5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                       for the State.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

                       petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

                       sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st, Bagaha, West

                       Champaran in connection with Choutarwa P.S. Case No. 162 of

                       2025.


                                                           (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.