Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shishupal Kushwaha @ Shishpal Kumar KhushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties and the conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS/Section 437(3) of the CrPC.

Summary

The petitioner, a driver, was arrested at the scene of a seizure of 2,556 litres of foreign liquor concealed in a truck and charged with offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, had no knowledge of the contraband, and that the seizure list violated Section 103 of the Narcotic Substances Act because no independent witness was produced. The prosecution opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the High Court held that bail could be granted, subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, one of whom must be a close relative, and the condition that the petitioner cooperate with the trial. The trial court was directed to verify the petitioner’s clean antecedent and cancel bail if any concealed criminal record is discovered. The order was issued without delay for verification.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the seizure list was prepared in violation of Section 103 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act due to lack of an independent witness.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • foreign liquor
  • driver
  • seizure
  • criminal procedure
  • verification of antecedent
  • section 103
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 11829 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-606 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Shishupal Kushwaha @ Shishpal Kumar Khushwaha Son of Chhotelal
                 Kushwaha R/O village - Parsauni Fajinagar @ Fazilnagar, P.S.- Padherwa,
                 Dist.- Kushinagar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Usha Kumari
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR

                                                 ORAL ORDER

2   17-02-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2 The petitioner is in custody in connection with

                   Chakia PS Case No 606 of 2025 for allegedly having committed

                   an offence under Sections 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2), 3 (5) of

                   the BNS and Sections 30 (a), 41 (1) and 52 of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   2556 liters of English/foreign made liquor was seized from a

                   truck having a separate compartment for concealing the same

                   and the petitioner was arrested from the spot.                    The learned

                   counsel for the petitioner furthers submits that the petitioner is

                   not the owner of the truck and he is only the Driver and it was

                   not within his knowledge that such a huge quantity of foreign
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11829 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                            2/3




          liquor has been concealed. The learned counsel for the petitioner

          further submits that the seizure list has been prepared in

          complete violation of the provisions of Section 103 of the

          BNSS, since no independent witness has come forward to

          support the prosecution case and there is no eye witness to the

          occurrence.       The learned counsel for the petitioner further

          submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since

          08.12.2025 and he has got clean antecedent.

                       4 The learned APP opposes the prayer for bail

          vehemently.

                       5 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, let the

          petitioner above named be released on bail on his furnishing bail

          bond of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to

          the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court

          III, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Chakia PS

          Case No 606 of 2025 subject to the condition as laid down

          under Section 480 (3) of the BNSS/437 (3) of the Cr P C with a

          condition that :

                                  (i) one of the bailors should be a
                       close relative/family member of the
                       petitioner,

                       (ii) the petitioner will cooperate in the trial.

                       6 The learned trial Court shall verify the criminal
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11829 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage if it is found

                     that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, then

                     the Court below shall take steps for cancellation of his bail

                     bond. However, the acceptance of the bail bond in terms of the

                     above mentioned order shall not be delayed for the purpose of

                     or in the name of verification.



                                                 (Ritesh Kumar, J)
M.E.H./-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.