Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Umesh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The criminal appeal (SJ) No.408 of 2025 is restored to its original file.

Summary

The petitioners, Umesh Prasad and his sons Amarjeet Kumar and Sanjeet Kumar, filed a restoration petition (Cr. Misc. No.11926 of 2026) seeking to revive Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.408 of 2025 against the State of Bihar and respondent Dharmendra Chaudhary. The High Court examined whether the appeal, which had been removed from the court's file, could be reinstated. Relying on procedural provisions, the Court held that the appeal could be restored upon satisfactory compliance with the requirements of the restoration petition. Consequently, the Court ordered that the appeal be restored to its original file and granted the petitioners an additional four weeks to comply with the earlier order dated 13‑08‑2025. The miscellaneous petition was thereafter disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for restoring a criminal appeal that has been removed from the court's file?

Subjects

  • restoration of appeal
  • criminal procedure
  • criminal appeal
  • procedural law
  • time extension

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11926 of 2026
                                               In
                                 CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.408 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2016 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya

                 ======================================================
           1.     Umesh Prasad S/O Birwal Prasad @ Birendra Prasad R/O Village- Keejopi,
                  P.S.- Chan Dauti, Distt.- Gaya.
           2.    Amarjeet Kumar S/O Umesh Paswan R/O Village- Keejopi, P.S.- Chan
                 Dauti, Distt.- Gaya.
           3.    Sanjeet Kumar S/O Umesh Paswan R/O Village- Keejopi, P.S.- Chan Dauti,
                 Distt.- Gaya.


                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus


           1.    The State of Bihar BIHAR
           2.    Dharmendra Chaudhary S/O Ashok Chaudhary R/O Village- Niyajpur, P.S-
                 Chandauti, Distt.- Gaya.



                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner        :     Mr. Kaushal Kishor, Advocate
                 For the State             :     Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   25-02-2026                        Heard Mr. Kaushal Kishor, learned counsel for the

                   petitioners and Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, learned APP for the State.

                                 2. For the reasons stated in the restoration petition, the

                   prayer for restoration is allowed and Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 408 of

                   2025 is restored to its original file.

                                3. Cr. Misc. No. 11926 of 2026 stands disposed of.

                                4. As prayed on behalf of the petitioners, four weeks’
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11926 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     further time is allowed to comply the order dated 13.08.2025

                     passed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 408 of 2025.



                                                                   (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.