Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tuntun Ray @ Tuntun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Tuntun Ray, filed an application in the High Court of Patna in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 12018 of 2025 arising from PS Case No. 249 of 2024. The application was made against the State of Bihar and two co‑accused, Pappu Ray and Shivnath Ray. During the hearing on 27‑01‑2026, counsel for the petitioner requested that the application be withdrawn. The court, after hearing the parties, granted permission for the withdrawal. Accordingly, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, and no substantive merits were adjudicated.

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • application dismissed
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12018 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2024 Thana- PATEPUR District- Vaishali
                  ======================================================
                  Tuntun Ray @ Tuntun Kumar S/O Sh. Kamlesh Ray Resident of Village-
                  Repura, P.S- Patepur, Distt.- Vaishali, Bihar.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
             1.   The State of Bihar Bihar
             2.   Pappu Ray S/O Harilal Ray R/O Village- Repura, P.S- Patepur, Distt.-
                  Vaishali, Bihar.
             3.    Shivnath Ray S/O Brahmdeo Ray R/O Village- Repura, P.S- Patepur, Distt.-
                   Vaishali, Bihar.
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Prakash Chandra, Advocate
                  For the State            :        Mr. Lalan Kumar, A.P.P
                  For the O.P. No. 2       :        Mrs. Sudha, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                        ORAL ORDER
4    27-01-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                    A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing for the

                    Opposite Party No. 2.

                                  2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Soni Shrivastava, J)
vashudha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.