Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mintu Kumar @ Mintu SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioners, three residents of Ghasipakar village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Chakia P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025) involving alleged assault causing simple injury under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act, 2023. They contended that the allegations against them were vague, that the injury was minor, and that they had clean antecedents, noting that similarly situated co‑accused had previously been granted anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, considering the nature of the injury and the lack of specific allegations, allowed the anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to furnish bail bonds of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the BNSS given the nature of the alleged offence and the simplicity of the victim's injury.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • simple injury
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar
  • BNSS
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12026 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Mintu Kumar @ Mintu Sah Son of Late Sitaram Sah Resident of Village -
                  Ghasipakar, P.S. - Chakia, District - East Champaran, Bihar.
           2.    Sunil Kumar Son of Late Sudama Sah Resident of Village - Ghasipakar, P.S.
                 - Chakia, District - East Champaran, Bihar.
           3.     Sandip Kumar Son of Binod Sah Resident of Village - Ghasipakar, P.S. -
                  Chakia, District - East Champaran, Bihar.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned counsel for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Chakia P.S. Case No. 328 of 2025, for offences under

                   Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5)

                   of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. As per prosecution case is that the petitioners and

                   others FIR named accused are alleged of assaulting the victim

                   causing simple injury.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. It is next submitted that injury sustained by the

                   victim is simple in nature. There is no specific allegation of

                   assault or overt act is against the petitioners rather the allegation
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12026 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      is general and omnibus. Petitioners claims clean antecedent.

                      Similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted

                      privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated

                      04.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 89446 of 2025.

                                   5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                      the prayer for bail.

                                   6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of

                      the case and the fact that injury sustained by the victim is simple

                      in nature, the application for anticipatory bail stands allowed.

                                   7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in

                      the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in

                      the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing

                      bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari/concerned

                      Court below, in connection with Chakia P.S. Case No. 328 of

                      2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                      482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                     (Sandeep Kumar, J)

Ranjeet/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.