Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Niranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered under sections 281, 304, 3(5) and later 317(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, alleging that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. The prosecution alleged that three unknown persons snatched Rs. 97,000 from the informant, and a confessional statement by an apprehended suspect named the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the only material against him is the confessional statement and that Rs. 10,000 recovered from his possession is his salary, with no other evidence and no TIP conducted. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the court found the circumstances sufficient to grant regular bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite being named in a confessional statement.
  • Whether the recovery of Rs.10,000 from the petitioner’s possession justifies denial of bail.
  • Whether the lack of a TIP and other substantive evidence warrants granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • confessional statement
  • Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act
  • sections 281, 304, 317
  • judicial custody
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12042 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2025 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Niranjan Kumar S/O Akhilesh Ram @ Aklesh Ram R/O Village- Mangal
                 Bigha, P.S- Amba, Distt.- Aurangabad.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mrs. Mukul Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-03-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 281, 304

                   and 3(5) of BNS and later on Section 317(2) of BNS was added.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that three unknown

                   miscreants have snatched Rs. 97,000/- from the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged

                   against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation,

                   one Prince was apprehended and he has given his confessional

                   statement and he has named this petitioner. It has also been

                   submitted that from the possession of this petitioner, altogether
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12042 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      Rs. 10,000/- was recovered and regarding that learned counsel

                      has submitted that the same belongs to the petitioner as he is

                      also working in the same company where the informant works

                      and this is his salary amount. No TIP has been conducted. Save

                      and except confessional statement, there is nothing against him.

                      Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since

                      05.11.2025. Learned counsel has also submitted that petitioner

                      is having criminal antecedent of four cases which has been

                      brought by her through supplementary affidavit.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                      vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 455 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.