Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subelal Chauhan @ Surajbhan ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Subelal Chauhan was arrested on 14 January 2026 for alleged assault, extortion and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, following an incident at a school where he allegedly threatened and assaulted the principal. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging the informant filed a false case due to a prior dispute and that he had been suspended by the District Magistrate. The prosecution opposed bail, highlighting five prior criminal antecedents, though noting acquittal in one case and bail in four others. The High Court considered the seriousness of the charges, the petitioner’s criminal history, and the possibility of tampering with evidence. It ordered the release of the petitioner on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation, appearance, and non‑tampering, and directed verification of his antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the gravity of the offences alleged under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the allegations of false prosecution by the informant affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal antecedents
  • assault
  • extortion
  • Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita
  • high court
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12222 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2026 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Subelal Chauhan @ Surajbhan Chauhan S/o Kailash Chauhan Resident of
                 Village- Chadihari, P.S.- Pakaribarawan, District- Nawada,

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate
                                                 Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP
                 For the Informant        :      Ms. Kiran Kumari, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   30-04-2026                          Heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned senior

                   counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Ms. Kiran Kumari,

                   learned counsel for the Informant.

                                2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   14.01.2026 in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 23

                   of 2026, F.I.R. dated 13.01.2026 for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 74,76, 308(5), 132,

                   351(2), 352, 224 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. According to prosecution case, informant is the

                   Principal of Nawsrijit School at Village Chirihari and it is

                   alleged that on 13.01.2026 at about 9.30 A.M when she was

                   working in the school, this petitioner came to the office and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12222 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026
                                            2/4




          demanded Rs. 10,00/- at rangdari. She refused to give the

          money and on this, the petitioner threatened to kill her and not

          let the school run. He also abused her and tore her blouse and

          pulled her out of office, assaulting her. He also closed the gate

          of the school and forcibly tried to take the informant to his Thar

          vehicle.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the

          present case. He next submits that no such occurrence has taken

          place and due to some previous dispute, the informant has

          falsely implicated the petitioner in the present case. Infact the

          petitioner has complained before the District Magistrate,

          Nawada in respect of conduct of the informant and in response

          to that the District Magistrate, Nawada suspended the petitioner

          w.e.f from 27.03.2025 and for the same reason the informant has

          instituted false case against the petitioner and nothing has come

          during investigation which suggest the involvement of the

          petitioner in the present occurrence. He further submits that the

          police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the

          petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2026.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12222 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026
                                            3/4




          submits      that the petitioner carries five criminal antecedents

          other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of

          paragraph-3 of the bail application that the petitioner has been

          acquitted in one case and on bail in four cases.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

          Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Nawada in connection with

          Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 23 of 2026, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

          any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12222 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026
                                                        4/4




                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.