Patna High Court
Lallu Miyan @ Md. Firoj AnsariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
The petition for regular bail was denied.
Summary
The petitioner, Lallu Miyan, was arrested in connection with a robbery on a train where four accused allegedly snatched mobile phones and cash from passengers. The FIR alleged that the looted mobile phones were later recovered from the petitioner's residence. The petitioner applied for regular bail under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The court examined the case diary and noted that witnesses had supported the prosecution's case and that the stolen articles were found at the petitioner's house. Considering these circumstances, the court rejected the bail application but directed the trial court to expedite the trial within one year.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in a case punishable under section 392 IPC.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 392
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- robbery
- section 392 IPC
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12280 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2009 Thana- JHAJHA RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
Lallu Miyan @ Md. Firoj Ansari Son of Late Md. Naim Ansari R/o Village -
Lakhai, P.S. - Barhat, District - Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manohar Pd. Singh, Advocate
Mr. Brajesh sahay, Advocate
Mr. Md Shadab Alam Wazdi , Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the
offence punishable under section 392 of IPC .
3. As per F.I.R. informant alleged that when informant
was traveling from Bhatni to Tata Nagar in train, 4 accused
came with weapons and snatched mobile phones and Rs. 8000/-
in cash from passengers and got off.
4. On perusal of record, it appears that looted mobile
was recovered from house of this petitioner and on perusal of
para Nos. 27, 28, 31 and 52 of the case diary, witnesses have
supported the prosecution case .
5 . Considering the fact that looted articles were
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12280 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
2/2
recovered from house of this petitioner, materials available on
record and other circumstances of case, prayer for regular bail
of the petitioner is rejected. However, since petitioner is in
custody since 05.01.2026 , learned Trial Court is directed to
expedite and conclude the trial, within the period of one year
from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.