Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aash Bahadur RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Aash Bahadur Rai was arrested after police claimed to have recovered 12 grams of brown sugar from his pocket and charged him under sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, that the contraband was not in his conscious possession, and that the seizure was recorded only by police officers without any independent witness, also alleging non‑compliance with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The State opposed bail. Considering the arguments and the fact that the quantity was far below commercial levels, the Court decided to grant regular bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount to the Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, NDPS Act, Araria.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in an NDPS case involving 12 grams of contraband
  • Whether the seizure and alleged possession were lawfully established
  • Whether non‑compliance with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act affects bail eligibility

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • bail
  • possession
  • seizure
  • small quantity
  • Section 105
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12554 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2025 Thana- Basmatia District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Aash Bahadur Rai Son of Dhan Bahadur Rai Resident of Village - Deurali
                 Dharan, Ward no. 05, Police Station Sthai Chouki, Dist. - Sunsari, Nepal.

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr.Kumar Ravish, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr.Lalan Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-02-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 8 (c) and

                   21 (b) of the NDPS Act.

                                3.      The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that

                   altogether 12 grams of brown sugar was recovered from the

                   pocket of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   connection with the present case. It is further submitted that

                   nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. It is

                   further submitted that the witnesses to the seizure list are police

                   personnel and no independent witness has been associated with
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12554 of 2026(2) dt.27-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the alleged recovery. The police have also not complied with the

                      mandatory provisions of Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. It has

                      further been contended that the alleged contraband recovered

                      from the possession of the petitioner is more than small quantity

                      but much less than commercial quantity. Moreover, the

                      petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.07.2025.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. vehemently opposes the prayer for

                      bail.

                                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                      of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on

                      bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on

                      bail in connection with Basmatiya P.S. Case No. 39 of 2025 on

                      furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, NDPS Act, Araria.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Jagdish/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.