Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Lakhan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court ordered the release of the petitioner on regular bail.

Summary

Ram Lakhan Yadav was arrested in connection with an alleged acid attack that allegedly caused severe burns and blindness to the son of an informant, and was charged under sections 126(2), 109, 124(1) and 352 of the Bihar Penal Code. The petitioner pleaded innocence, arguing that the charge sheet was filed without an injury report and that the medical report showed only thermal injuries, not acid burns. He also asserted that the parties had reached a compromise over a retirement benefit dispute and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 23‑04‑2025. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court found the circumstances sufficient to grant regular bail, directing the petitioner’s release on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused despite the seriousness of the alleged acid attack.
  • Whether the absence of an injury report in the charge sheet and the nature of the injuries affect the bail decision.
  • Whether a compromise between the parties influences the grant of bail.

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • acid attack
  • Bihar Penal Code
  • charge sheet
  • injury report
  • compromise
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12699 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- LALIT NARAYAN UNIVERSITY
                                                    District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Ram Lakhan Yadav S/o Late Gauri yadav R/o Village- Ajam Nagar,
                 Phoolwali, Gali Ward No 05, Ps- L.N.M.U, Dist- Darbhanga

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr. Baidyanath Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr. Amitesh Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 109,

                   124(1) and 352 of BNS.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has

                   thrown acid on the face of the son of the informant due to which,

                   he has received burn injuries and has also got blind.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the

                   order of the learned trial court, it is clear that police has filed

                   charge sheet without injury report. He has also submitted injury

                   report issued by Darbhanga Medical Collge/Hospital, Laheriasarai
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12699 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      according to which, the injured has received thermal injuries. He

                      has further submitted that there is allegation of sprinkling acid

                      whereas the injuries are of thermal nature which does not

                      correlate. Learned counsel has further submitted due to

                      intervention of the well-wishers, the parties have compromised the

                      case. It is a dispute only regarding the retiremental benefit of the

                      petitioner which has now been settled. Moreover, the petitioner is

                      languishing in judicial custody since 23.04.2025 having no

                      criminal antecedent.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                      opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      L.N.M.U. P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Darbhanga.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.