Patna High Court
LALAN KUMAR @ LALAN RAVIDASversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The Court refused to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Summary
The petitioners, Lalan Kumar, Garib Ravidas and Kaushalya Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Barbigha P.S. Case No. 165 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the BNS, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, together with other accused, entered the informant Shiv Kumari’s house at night, assaulted her, her husband, daughter‑in‑law and other family members, causing grievous injuries and stealing a mangal sutra. Medical reports and witness statements supported the allegations of assault, grievous hurt and theft. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences, including assault on the abdomen and grievous injuries. Considering the nature of the allegations and the supporting evidence, the Court declined to grant anticipatory bail and dismissed the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners in view of the alleged offences under sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 329(3), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 74 and 352 of the BNS, 2023.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- assault
- grievous hurt
- theft
- Bihar Penal Law
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1277 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2025 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura
======================================================
1. LALAN KUMAR @ LALAN RAVIDAS S/o Garib Ravidas @ Gariban
Ravidas R/o vill - Babhanbigha, P.S.- Barbigha, Distt.- Sheikhpura
2. Garib Ravidas @ Gariban Ravidas S/o Late Lakhan Ravidas R/o vill -
Babhanbigha, P.S.- Barbigha, Distt.- Sheikhpura
3. Kaushalya Devi W/o Garib Ravidas @ Gariban Ravidas R/o vill -
Babhanbigha, P.S.- Barbigha, Distt.- Sheikhpura
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection
with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 165 of 2025, registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 329(3),
115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 74 and 352 of the BNS, 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the
informant, namely, Shiv Kumari and her family members were
sleeping in her house then (i) Garib Ravidas @ Gariban Ravidas
(ii) Kaushalya Devi (iii) Lalan Kumar @ Lalan Ravidas. (iv)
Bhagwan Das (v) Sanjay Ravidas (vi) Pindo Ravidas and other
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1277 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
2/3
5-6 unknown persons entered in her house and abused her and
her daughter-in-law and assaulted by iron rod and lathi (stick)
which cut the left hand of informant and her husband Prakash
Ravidas got severe injury on forehead. Her daughter-in-law
forearms also got injured. It is further alleged that accused
persons also assaulted the ex-mukhiya by iron rod due to which
he sustained injury and got admitted in Patna AIIMS for
treatment. The co-accused persons along with the petitioners
snatched mangal sutra from the neck of her daughter-in-law.
4. The allegations against the accused petitioners are
of assault to the informant and her family members while they
were sleeping in their house. The injury report of the
informant/victim and other injured persons reveal that injury
sustained by injured Shailendra Ravidas is grievous in nature,
Prakash Ravidas has sustained injury over vital organ of the
body i.e., right eye and Shiv Kumari has sustained injury over
left forearm. Learned Court below has perused the Case Diary
and observed that vide paragraph nos. 11, 12 and 13, the
witnesses have supported the allegation against the accused
persons.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of
anticipatory bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1277 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
3/3
6. Considering these aspects of the matter, particularly
when there is allegation of direct assault on abdomen by the
accused persons in the alleged offence, the Court is not inclined
to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-
U
Checking your session…