Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioners, directing their release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs 10,000 each with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioners, Sintu Kumar and Bhola Paswan, were arrested in connection with a robbery and assault alleged under Sections 309(6) and 311 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution claimed the accused intercepted an informant, assaulted him, and stole cash, a laptop, a charger, a Wi‑Fi device and a scanning device, and that the informant could identify the miscreants. The petitioners submitted that they had given confessional statements, that the seized items were recovered from their possession, and that the informant’s description of the stolen items was vague and no TIP (turn‑in‑person) was conducted. They also highlighted their clean criminal record and that they had been in judicial custody since 18‑10‑2025. The State opposed bail, but the court, after considering the circumstances, ordered the release of both petitioners on bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 each and two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 309(6) and 311 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act despite a confessional statement and alleged theft.
  • Whether the lack of a TIP and the informant’s vague identification affect the bail decision.
  • Whether the petitioners’ clean criminal record and length of custody justify regular bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • confessional statement
  • seizure of property
  • identification of accused
  • clean criminal record
  • Sections 309, 311

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12938 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2025 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sintu Kumar S/o Fago Paswan @ Faguni Paswan R/o Village - Sakarpura,
                  P.S - Hasanpur, District - Samastipur
           2.     Bhola Paswan @ Bola Paswan S/o Hareram Paswan R/o Village -
                  Sakarpura, P.S - Hasanpur, District - Samastipur
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   09-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a

                   case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(6)

                   and 311 of the BNS.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that three

                   persons on a bike intercepted the informant, assaulted him with

                   butt of weapon and looted Rupees Two Lakh, laptop, charger,

                   wi-fi and Marco scanning device. The informant has also sated

                   that he can identify the miscreants.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   during course of investigation the petitioners were apprehended

                   and they have given their confessional statement. It has further

                   been submitted that from perusal of the seizure list it will

                   transpire that the recovery have been made from the possession
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12938 of 2026(3) dt.09-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                      of both the petitioners but the articles which have been

                      recovered, they belong to the petitioners. It has further been

                      submitted that informant has nowhere specified the makes of

                      laptop or the mobile or scanning machine. It has further been

                      submitted that the informant has specifically stated that he can

                      identify the miscreants but in this case I.O. has not conducted

                      the TIP. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further

                      submitted that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent

                      and they are in judicial custody since 18.10.2025.

                                   5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                      the bail application of the petitioners.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

                      petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each of them with two sureties of the

                      like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II,

                      Rosera, Samastipur.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.