Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subhan Alam @ Aryan @ Shubhan AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court granted permission to withdraw the applications and dismissed them as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners Subhan Alam, Tehsin Reza and Sajid Alam filed criminal miscellaneous applications arising from PS Kurlikot Case No.61 of 2025. They sought the Court’s permission to withdraw these applications. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested withdrawal, and the State opposed. Justice Sandeep Kumar considered whether the Court may allow withdrawal of pending applications. He granted the petitioners’ request, holding that the applications could be withdrawn. Consequently, both applications were dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw pending criminal miscellaneous applications.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal miscellaneous procedure
  • court order

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13383 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2025 Thana- KURLIKOT District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Subhan Alam @ Aryan @ Shubhan Alam S/o Saidur Rahman R/o Village -
                 Kowabhitta, Ward No. 19, P.S - Kurlikot, District - Kishanganj

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                                                        with
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13386 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2025 Thana- KURLIKOT District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
           1.     Tehsin Reza @ Tahsin Raza S/o Saidur Rahman R/o Village - Kowabhitta,
                  Ward No. 19, P.S - Kurlikot, District - Kishanganj
           2.    Sajid Alam S/o Saidur Rahman R/o Village - Kowabhitta, Ward No. 19, P.S -
                 Kurlikot, District - Kishanganj

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13383 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jagdhar Prasad
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 13386 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   29-04-2026                 These cases arise out of the same P.S. Case i.e.,

                   Kurlikot P.S. Case No. 61 of 2025; therefore, they are being

                   heard together and disposed of by a common order.

                               2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   the learned counsel for the State.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13383 of 2026(4) dt.29-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   3. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks

                      permission to withdraw this application.

                                   4. Permission as prayed for is granted.

                                   5. Accordingly, both these applications are dismissed

                      as withdrawn.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.