Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jeerba DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioners subject to surrender, bond and sureties under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners—Jeerba Devi, Ranjay Yadav and Ranjeet Yadav—applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑death case (Shakurabad PS case No. 207 of 2024) under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleges that the deceased Khushbu Kumari was killed by her in‑laws following dowry demands, while the petitioners claim they are innocent, have no criminal antecedent, and that the main accusation is against the husband who is already in custody. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after hearing counsel, considered whether the petitioners could be granted anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the same Act, balancing the presumption of innocence against the need to ensure investigation. It held that bail could be granted subject to surrender, a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties, and other conditions. Accordingly, the petition for anticipatory bail was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in a dowry‑death case
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioners constitute a ground to deny anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry death
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • Section 80
  • Section 238
  • Section 3(5)
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13517 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2024 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
           1.     Jeerba Devi W/O Ramvriksh Yadav Resident of Village- Rustamchak, P.S-
                  Shakurabad, Distt.- Jehanabad.
           2.    Ranjay Yadav @ Ranjay Kumar S/O Ramvriksh Yadav Resident of Village-
                 Rustamchak, P.S- Shakurabad, Distt.- Jehanabad.
           3.    Ranjeet Yadav S/O Ramvriksh Yadav Resident of Village- Rustamchak, P.S-
                 Shakurabad, Distt.- Jehanabad.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Kumari Anjani Sinha, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   26-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

                   learned APP for the State.

                               2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been

                   filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection

                   with Shakurabad P.S. Case no. 207 of 2024 instituted for the

                   offence under Sections 80, 238, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                              3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that Khushbu

                   Kumari (deceased) was married to one Sanjit Kumar. It is

                   alleged that she was subjected to cruelty on account of non-

                   fulfillment of dowry demand. Ultimately, she was killed by her

                   in-laws.

                                  4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13517 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

          committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this

          case. He also submits that petitioner no. 1 is the mother-in-law,

          whereas petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are brothers-in-law of the

          deceased. He also submits that the husband is already in

          custody. The nature of the allegation is general and omnibus. He

          further submits that the main thrust of the allegation is against

          the husband. Petitioner no. 1 is a lady. He further submits that a

          statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the

          petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

                        5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has

          opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners.

                         6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this

          Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The

          petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a

          period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest

          or surrender in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case no. 207 of

          2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial

          Magistrate, 1st Class, Jehanabad subject to the conditions as laid
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13517 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                     Sanhita, 2023.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.