Patna High Court
Avinash Kumar @ Avinash Paswan @ Avinash Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the application, dismissing it as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioners, Avinash Kumar and Mantosh Kumar, surrendered before the lower court during the pendency of their criminal miscellaneous application. They filed a request before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the application. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued that the surrender rendered the application infructuous. The court examined whether the petitioners could be allowed to withdraw the pending application. Finding that the surrender indeed made the application moot, the court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application after surrendering before the lower court?
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- surrender
- infructuous
- criminal miscellaneous
- high court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1363 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2025 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
1. Avinash Kumar @ Avinash Paswan @ Avinash Kumar Paswan S/o Bhikhari
Paswan Resident of village - Baghra, Police Station- Mohanpur, District -
Samastipur.
2. Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Paswan S/o Munshi Paswan Resident of village
- Baghra, Police Station- Mohanpur, District - Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 13-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned counsel for the State.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
during the pendency of this application, the petitioners have
surrendered before the Court below, therefore, he seeks
permission to withdraw this application.
3. Permission as prayed is granted.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U
Checking your session…