Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was refused.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a robbery case (PS Case No. 345 of 2022) under Sections 382 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR alleged that three assailants looted Rs. 60,000 at gunpoint and later left the stolen motorcycle at the petitioner's father's house. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating that no stolen motorcycle was in his possession. The State opposed the bail, highlighting the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent. The Court, weighing the seriousness of the charge and the antecedent, refused the anticipatory bail application.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate decision on the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail under the circumstances?
  • Does the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent justify denial of anticipatory bail?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • Theft
  • IPC 382
  • IPC 34
  • bail jurisprudence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13758 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2022 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Abhishek Kumar S/o- Yadavlal Rai @ Yadav Lal Ray R/v- Koirgawa Ps-
                 Kotwa Dist- East Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-03-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Kotwal P. S. Case

                   No. 345 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under

                   Section 382/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. As per F.I.R., on 26.08.2022 at about 7 PM, when

                   informant was crossing Talwa bridge, three miscreants, riding

                   on motorcycle, stopped and looted Rs. 60,000/- on point of

                   pistol and fled away along with his motorcycle. Later on,

                   motorcycle of the informant was found parked in the house of

                   the father of this petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. No stolen

                   motorcycle was recovered from the possession of this petitioner.

                                5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13758 of 2026(2) dt.23-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        the bail application and submitted that petitioner has got one

                        criminal antecedent.

                                     6. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal

                        antecedent, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is

                        refused.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.