Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ujjawal Kumar Singh @ UjjawalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, finding the circumstances sufficient to justify release.

Summary

Ujjawal Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a seizure of 8.33 kg of ganja from a tempo where he was a passenger. He was charged under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(II)(B) and 22(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner argued that no contraband was recovered from his possession, that the seizure violated Section 105 of the BNSS, and that he was merely a passenger with no criminal antecedent. The State opposed regular bail. Considering the lack of direct possession, procedural lapses, the quantity being less than commercial, and the petitioner’s clean record, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner, as a passenger, is liable for bail under the NDPS Act for the seized quantity
  • Whether the seizure complied with Section 105 of the BNSS
  • Whether the quantity seized warrants denial of bail under the NDPS Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • bail
  • drug seizure
  • passenger liability
  • Section 105 BNSS
  • quantity of narcotics
  • procedural lapse

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13772 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2025 Thana- BALIA BELON District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Ujjawal Kumar Singh @ Ujjawal Son of Late Dev Narayan Singh RO
                 Mohalla - Nayatola Anytola, P.S. - Nagar Hajipur, Dist. - Vaishali Permanent
                 R/o Mohalla - Fatehbad P.S. - Peru, District - Muzaffarpur.
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Satyendra Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-03-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)

                   (II)(B) 22 (b) of the NDPS Act.

                                3.    The case of the prosecution, in short, is that a

                   tempo was intercepted by police. On the back seat of the said

                   tempo, the petitioner along with one lady was sitting and it is

                   alleged that from possession of this petitioner altogether 8.33 kg

                   of ganja was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   nothing has been recovered from the possession of this

                   petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further

                   submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13772 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the

                      BNSS while making seizure. Learned counsel for the petitioner

                      has further submitted that petitioner was only a passenger in that

                      tempo and he has falsely been implicated in this case. It has

                      further been submitted by learned counsel that alleged recovery

                      of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much

                      less than the commercial quantity. Learned counsel for the

                      petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is having no

                      criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since

                      12.10.2025.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed

                      the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                      of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on

                      bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on

                      bail in connection with Balia Belon P.S. Case No. 158 of 2025

                      on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      Session Judge, Katihar.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.