Patna High Court
Om Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.13944 of 2024 before the Patna High Court. The application sought relief in a criminal matter arising from a case registered at P.S. Shahpur Patori, Samastipur. During the hearing on 8 January 2026, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing arguments, granted the petitioner's request to withdraw. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application as withdrawn, without further adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the pending application before the High Court
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- high court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13944 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2023 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur
======================================================
Om Prakash Kumar Son of Late Nirmal Narendra Roy Resident of Village-
Hetanpur Dhamaun, P.S.- Patori, District- Samastipur, at present of Road No.-
2, Extention, Rajbanshi Nagar, L.B.S. Nagar, P.S. Shastrinagar, District-Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Avinash Kumar S/o Late Nirmal Narendra Roy Resident of Village-
Hatanpur Dhamaun, P.S.- Patori, District- Samastipur
3. Arun Kumar Roy Son of Late Raj Japan Roy Resident of Village- Hatanpur
Dhamaun, P.S.- Patori, District- Samastipur
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukund Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
4 08-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U T
Checking your session…