Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chhotu Pandey @ Ranjan PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to the conditions stipulated under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

Chhotu Pandey was arrested in Kateya, Gopalganj, for allegedly possessing a country‑made katta, alleged offence under Section 25(1‑B)(a) of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the weapon was planted and no cartridge was recovered, and sought bail after being in custody since 27‑10‑2025 with a charge sheet already filed. The State opposed the bail application. The court, considering the length of custody, the nature of the evidence, and the filing of the charge sheet, ordered the release of the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and additional personal surety and attendance requirements. The bail bond would be cancelled if the petitioner missed three consecutive court dates or violated any condition.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 25(1‑B)(a) of the Arms Act given the circumstances of arrest and evidence.
  • Whether the conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS are applicable to the bail order.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • illegal possession of firearm
  • pre‑trial detention
  • Section 25
  • Section 480(3) BNSS
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1404 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-603 Year-2025 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Chhotu Pandey @ Ranjan Pandey S/O Rambharosha Pandey Resident of
                 Village - Lohati, P.S- Kateya, District- Gopalganj
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   15-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 603 of 2025, registered

                   for the offences under Sections 25(1-B)(a) of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner was

                   apprehended with a country made katta.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been

                   falsely implicated in this case. Recovery shown from the

                   petitioner is planted moreover no cartridge was recovered from

                   the petitioner and recovery of merely a country made katta has

                   been shown from the petitioner for which he is in custody since

                   27.10.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

                                5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

                   submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

                                6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and

                   submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1404 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       period of custody of the petitioner and submission of charge

                       sheet, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on

                       furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

                       Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                       satisfaction of learned ACJM-VIth Gopalganj/concerned court,

                       in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 603 of 2025, subject to

                       the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and

                       other following conditions:

                                               (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                               relative of the petitioner.

                                               (ii) The petitioner will remain present on

                                               each and every date fixed by the court

                                               below, if so required by the learned trial

                                               court.

                                               (iii) In case of absence on three

                                               consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                               terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                               petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

                                               by the court concerned.



                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Anuradha/-
U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.