Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

In the absence of a specific rape allegation against the petitioner and considering his clean antecedent, age, and custody period, bail was granted subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

Nitish Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged offences under Sections 65(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, where a co‑accused was said to have raped a minor. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner helped the co‑accused by preventing a cousin from raising alarm, while the petitioner contended that no specific rape allegation was made against him and that he has a clean antecedent. The petitioner had been in custody since 28‑11‑2025 and a charge‑sheet had been filed. The State opposed bail, arguing the petitioner aided the commission of the offence. The court, noting the lack of a specific rape charge against the petitioner, his young age, clean record, and the fact that a charge‑sheet was already filed, applied Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and ordered bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions. The bail order was directed to be implemented by the District & Additional Sessions Judge‑VII, West Champaran.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the allegation of assisting in a rape under the POCSO Act
  • Whether the specific nature of the charge against the petitioner satisfies the criteria for denial of bail under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • POCSO Act
  • rape
  • minor
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 480(3)
  • Bihar High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14139 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- NAURANGIA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Nitish Kumar @ Nitesh Kumar S/O Harendra Sahani @ Harind Sahani R/O
                 Village- Madanpura, Police Station- Naurangia, District- West Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    X D/O Y R/O Village- Bakuli Majhaua, Police Station- Laukariya, District-
                 West Champaran

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr.Anant Kumar 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

6   24-06-2026                   Despite notice being received by the relative of the

                   informant and granting adjournment, no one appears on behalf

                   of the informant/opposite party no. 2.

                                 02. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                 03. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Naurangia P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025 registered

                   for the alleged offences under Sections 65(1), 3(5) of BNS and

                   Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

                                 04. As per prosecution case, co-accused Kamlesh

                   Kumar committed rape with the minor informant and allegation

                   against the petitioner is that he prevented his cousin, who was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14139 of 2026(6) dt.24-06-2026
                                            2/3




          friend of the victim, from raising any alarm. All these persons

          have been returning from attending a party from the house of

          the aunt of the friend of the victim girl and rape was

          committed.

                       05. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the

          specific allegation of committing rape is not against this

          petitioner, who is a young man of 22 years. The petitioner is

          having clean antecedent. The petitioner is in custody since

          28.11.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted.

                       06. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that the petitioner

          by his conduct has helped co-accused in committing rape with

          the minor girl.

                       07. Having regard to the nature of allegation which is

          not specific for committing rape against this petitioner and also

          considering the age, period of custody of the petitioner, his clean

          antecedent and submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above

          named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds

          of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional

          Sessions Judge-VII cum Special Judge, West Champaran,

          Bettiah/concerned Court in connection with Naurangia P.S. Case
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14139 of 2026(6) dt.24-06-2026
                                                        3/3




                      No. 129 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section

                      480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :

                                                      (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                                      relative of the petitioner.

                                                      (ii) The petitioner will remain present

                                                      on each and every date fixed by the

                                                      court below.

                                                      (iii) In case of absence on three

                                                      consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                                      terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                                      petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

                                                      by the court concerned.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.