Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravindra Kumar Mandal @ Ravinadra Kumar Mandal @ Ravindra @ Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Ravindra Kumar Mandal, accused under sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, applied for regular bail. The FIR alleged his involvement in a kidnapping for ransom (Case 150) and the recovery of a country‑made pistol that a co‑accused, Radhe Sah, had allegedly thrown into a water body. The petitioner argued that the pistol was disposed of by the co‑accused and that he had no role in that act. The State opposed bail, but the court noted that the firearm was recovered from the water body due to the co‑accused’s action, the petitioner had been in custody for six months since 1‑Sept‑2025, and a chargesheet had already been filed. Considering these factors, the court ordered that the petitioner be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under the Arms Act in view of the allegations and the fact that the firearm was disposed of by a co‑accused.
  • Whether the prolonged pre‑trial custody of six months without trial justifies the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • regular bail
  • kidnapping
  • firearm
  • co‑accused
  • custody
  • chargesheet

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14186 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- NIRMALI District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Ravindra Kumar Mandal @ Ravinadra Kumar Mandal @ Ravindra @
                 Ravindra Kumar S/o Maheshwar Mandal Resident of Village- Dhanchhiya,
                 Ward No 07, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ranjit Kumar Yadav, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Urgesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-03-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Nirmali P.S. Case

                   no.151 of 2025 registered under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35

                   of the Arms Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, Nirmali P.S. Case

                   no.150 of 2025 was registered wherein the petitioner herein was

                   an accused. The allegations in the said FIR was that the accused

                   persons had kidnapped the owner of a Wagon-R vehicle for

                   ransom. The informant further states that two days later

                   information was received that one of the accused of Nirmali P.S.

                   Case no.150 of 2025 namely Radhe Sah had tried to dispose of a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14186 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                            2/3




          country made pistol in a water body. The informant reached

          there and on his request, one of the persons/villagers namely

          Md. Rizwan who was present entered the water body and

          recovered the country made pistol which on test was found to be

          in a working condition.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          from the FIR itself it would transpire that so far as the other case

          relating to kidnapping for ransom is concerned, the same is not

          the subject matter of the instant FIR. So far as the recovery of

          the firearm is concerned, as per the informant himself, the same

          had been thrown in the water body by co-accused Radhe Sah

          and not the petitioner herein. The petitioner is in custody since

          1.9.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P

          for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the firearm

          seized from the water body having been thrown by co-accused

          Radhe Sah and not the petitioner herein together with the

          petitioner having remained in custody for 6 months since

          1.9.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14186 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026
                                                         3/3




                       Nirmali P.S. Case no.151 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                       Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                       amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

                       Magistrate, 1st Class, Birpur, District- Supaul.



                                                   (Partha Sarthy, J)
Shiv/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.